Skip to main content

Security report for anthroposophie-gegen-rassismus.de

Anthroposophische Gesellschaft in Deutschland e.V. · Education · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Anthroposophie gegen Rassismus' is operated by the Anthroposophische Gesellschaft in Deutschland e.V. and serves as an informational platform dedicated to clarifying misconceptions about Anthroposophy related to racism, antisemitism, and right-wing extremism. It provides educational content, publications, blog articles, and official statements to promote a humanistic and inclusive understanding of Anthroposophy. The target audience includes individuals interested in Waldorf education, biodynamic products, and those seeking critical discourse on these topics. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS, hosted by Infomaniak, and employs modern frontend libraries ensuring good mobile optimization and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers could be improved. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, but no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and serves a niche educational purpose effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anthroposophie-gegen-rassismus.de

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Anthroposophische Gesellschaft in Deutschland e.V. positions itself as a key actor within the anthroposophical movement in Germany, focusing on social responsibility and combating racism and extremism. The website supports this mission by providing authoritative content and linking to partner organizations such as Demeter and Waldorf schools. The business model is non-commercial, centered on education and advocacy. The organization maintains a consistent brand and clear messaging, which strengthens its credibility within its niche. Growth indicators include active blog updates and a broad range of publications. Partnerships with recognized anthroposophical and biodynamic entities enhance its ecosystem and outreach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of visible security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies indicate room for improvement. No signs of vulnerable libraries or insecure forms were detected. The site does not appear to collect sensitive user data directly, reducing risk exposure. Overall, the security maturity is good for a non-commercial informational site but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anthroposophische Gesellschaft in Deutschland e.V.
Description
Die Website informiert über die Anthroposophie und deren Haltung gegen Rassismus, Rechtsextremismus und Antisemitismus. Sie bietet Aufklärung, Publikationen, Stellungnahmen und Blogbeiträge zu diesen Themen.
Key services
Informationsbereitstellung, Publikationen und Buchvorstellungen, Blog mit aktuellen Beiträgen, Stellungnahmen und Erklärungen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Jarallax
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on clarifying and distancing Anthroposophy from racism and right-wing extremism.
  3. The site uses TYPO3 CMS and modern frontend libraries for UI.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact is via a contact page form.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. External links mostly to related anthroposophical and educational organizations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, indicating a stable technical foundation. Frontend technologies include jQuery, Owl Carousel for content sliders, and Jarallax for parallax effects, which provide a modern and interactive user experience. Hosting is managed by Infomaniak, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured navigation. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, though some accessibility improvements could be made. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the site's educational mission effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anthroposophie-gegen-rassismus.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anthroposophie-gegen-rassismus.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.