Skip to main content

Security report for anqa.ch

Anqa IT-Security GmbH · Technology · Switzerland

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anqa IT-Security GmbH is a specialized provider of IT security awareness and training services, focusing on cyber-sensibilization for employees primarily targeting Swiss SMEs. Their offerings include phishing simulations, e-learning with certification, dark web scans, and review meetings to enhance organizational cybersecurity culture. The company maintains a partnership with Mobiliar Versicherung, providing exclusive discounts and free training options for insurance customers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with multilingual support and uses modern JavaScript libraries for UI elements. However, the site suffers from a lack of a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which significantly impacts its security posture. DNS records show proper email security configurations such as SPF and DMARC with a reject policy, but no advanced security headers or TLS protocols are enabled. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is content-rich and professionally designed but requires urgent security improvements to protect users and data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anqa.ch

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the cybersecurity training niche, targeting SMEs in Switzerland with a focus on employee awareness to prevent cyberattacks. Their business model leverages partnerships with insurance providers to offer bundled services and discounts, enhancing market reach. The presence of TÜV certification and detailed reporting capabilities positions them as a credible and professional player. The website content and structure support their positioning as experts in IT security awareness, although the lack of HTTPS may undermine trust. Growth potential exists through expanding training offerings and strengthening compliance and security measures. The partnership ecosystem includes Mobiliar Versicherung, which is a strategic advantage. The company appears small-sized with a focused service portfolio and localized market presence.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS, exposing users to potential interception risks. While DNS-based email security (SPF, DMARC) is properly configured, the web server does not support modern TLS protocols or security headers, increasing vulnerability to attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, indicating limited transparency in security operations. The site does not implement cookie consent mechanisms, which may affect GDPR compliance. The presence of a TÜV certification for cybersecurity awareness is a positive indicator of internal security culture. Overall, the site requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of security headers and privacy controls to improve its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy.
  5. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Anqa IT-Security GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WPML for multilingual support, using JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for slideshows and Typewriter.js for text effects. Custom fonts are loaded via web font files. Hosting is provided by Strato (rzone.de), as indicated by DNS records and SPF configuration. Performance is suboptimal with a load time near 10 seconds and a large page size (~940 KB). Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic but functional. No forms are present on the main page, reducing direct data collection risks. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a critical technical deficiency. No advanced frameworks or platforms beyond WordPress and standard JS libraries are detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anqa.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anqa.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.