Skip to main content

Security report for angelbird.com

Angelbird Technologies GmbH · Technology · Austria

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Angelbird Technologies GmbH operates a professional e-commerce platform specializing in high-performance storage media such as memory cards, SSDs, and custom media solutions tailored for camera and audio professionals. The company positions itself as a niche market leader with a focus on quality and innovation, serving a global audience with a strong presence in Austria. The website demonstrates a solid digital infrastructure with modern web technologies, fast performance, and good mobile optimization. Security posture is generally good with valid SSL certificates, secure cookie practices, and HSTS enabled, though the lack of modern TLS protocols and absence of a cookie consent mechanism indicate areas for improvement. The company maintains active social media channels and provides comprehensive privacy and terms of service documentation, supporting trust and compliance. Overall, Angelbird shows a mature digital presence with room to enhance security and privacy transparency further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching angelbird.com

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention angelbird.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
637
Employees
0
Customers
637
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for angelbird.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Angelbird's market positioning leverages partnerships with industry giants like RED, Atomos, and ARRI, enhancing its credibility and reach in the professional media storage sector. The business model centers on direct e-commerce sales and custom media solutions, targeting camera and audio professionals who demand reliable and cutting-edge storage technology. The company benefits from a consistent brand identity and a well-structured website that facilitates user engagement and conversion. Growth indicators include active product promotions, special editions, and a focus on sustainability. The partnership ecosystem is robust, supporting product innovation and market penetration. Strategic observations suggest that Angelbird could expand its market share by enhancing its digital marketing transparency and security compliance to meet evolving regulatory demands.

Security posture

Angelbird demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with key strengths including secure cookie attributes, HSTS enforcement, and absence of known SSL vulnerabilities. However, the SSL configuration lacks support for modern TLS versions, which could expose the site to future cryptographic weaknesses. The absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response plan, and vulnerability disclosure mechanism limits transparency and may hinder rapid incident handling. GDPR compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy, but the lack of a cookie consent mechanism and data protection officer contact information indicates partial compliance gaps. The security culture appears focused on foundational best practices but would benefit from enhanced documentation and proactive communication channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols to strengthen SSL security and future-proof encryption.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to ensure full GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and host a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Activate DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on infrastructure managed by TransIP and served via nginx web server. The tech stack includes Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, and JavaScript for interactivity. Analytics are handled by Matomo, configured to disable cookies, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. Performance metrics indicate fast load times and efficient resource management. The absence of a known CMS suggests a custom-built platform, which may require dedicated maintenance resources. Technical risks include outdated SSL protocol support and lack of DNSSEC, which could impact security and trust. Opportunities exist to modernize encryption protocols and enhance compliance tooling to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with angelbird.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review angelbird.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.