Skip to main content

Security report for anazana.com

SIA anazana · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

anaZana is a Latvian-based company founded in 2010 specializing in digital marketing and IT solutions tailored for businesses. Their offerings include digital marketing management, website and landing page development, mobile application creation, business process automation, and white-label IT system development. The company targets businesses seeking to grow and digitalize their operations, positioning itself as a reliable and personalized IT partner with over 300 active clients and notable partnerships including Google and Latvian development agencies. Technically, the website employs modern tracking and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and HubSpot Analytics, with a responsive design and good SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosure policies are absent. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, but the professional website content and business information mitigate immediate trust issues. Overall, anaZana presents as a credible mid-sized technology service provider with room for improvement in security transparency and contact information clarity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anazana.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

anaZana operates in the technology sector focusing on digital marketing and IT services for businesses primarily in Latvia. Their competitive advantage lies in personalized service and a broad portfolio of digital solutions, including marketing, web development, and automation. Revenue streams likely derive from managed service contracts and project-based IT development. The company serves a diverse client base, including public sector entities and private companies, supported by partnerships with recognized organizations. Growth indicators include a client base exceeding 300 active customers and ongoing collaborations with development agencies. The partnership ecosystem includes Google and local Latvian institutions, enhancing market credibility. Strategic observations suggest a focus on digital transformation services aligned with regional business needs and EU-funded projects.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests limited formal incident response readiness. Data protection practices appear aligned with GDPR, supported by privacy policy presence and cookie management. Overall, the security culture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls to strengthen trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a formal vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve incident response transparency.
  3. Enhance contact information by adding verified company phone numbers with clear labeling to improve user trust and accessibility.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and marketing tools to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and broaden user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA anazana
Description
anaZana provides digital marketing and IT solutions for businesses, including website development, mobile app development, integrations, and automation services. They focus on personalized and reliable IT services to help clients grow and digitalize their businesses.
Key services
Digital Marketing, Website and IT Solutions Development, Mobile Application Development, Integration and Automation Services, White Label IT System Development, Local Product Search Portals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, Zendesk Widget, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Roboto Condensed), Custom JavaScript and CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure contact forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language
  2. Professional digital marketing and IT services provider
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented
  4. No phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact found
  5. Multiple company contact emails provided
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy found
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some legitimacy questions
  8. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, and Zendesk for customer support. It employs responsive design techniques and custom CSS/JavaScript for UI elements like burger menus and slideshows. The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears custom or proprietary. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anazana.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anazana.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.