Skip to main content

Security report for cesu1pamatskola.anazana.com

SIA anazana · Technology · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

anaZana is a Latvian-based technology company specializing in digital marketing and IT solutions for businesses. Founded in 2010 by experienced IT professionals, the company offers a range of services including website development, mobile application creation, integration and automation services, and white-label IT system development. With over 300 active clients and partnerships with reputable organizations such as Google and the Latvian Investment and Development Agency, anaZana positions itself as a trusted partner for business digitalization and growth. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized and features a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incomplete WHOIS data indicate areas for improvement in security and transparency. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent, but lacks visible security policies and incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The missing WHOIS registration details reduce trust slightly, but the professional presentation and business information support legitimacy. Overall, anaZana demonstrates a solid digital presence with good content quality and business credibility. Strategic enhancements in security headers, WHOIS transparency, and explicit security policies would further strengthen its security posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cesu1pamatskola.anazana.com

This scan found 12 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
Average
81
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

anaZana operates in the technology sector, focusing on B2B digital marketing and IT services. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized, reliable service backed by over a decade of experience and a broad client base. The business model centers on managed services and custom IT solutions, targeting SMEs and enterprises seeking digital transformation. Revenue streams likely include service contracts for marketing, web development, and software solutions. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with recognized entities, enhancing market credibility. Growth indicators include a large number of attracted clients and active partnerships. The website content and client logos reflect a mature, professional operation with a clear market position in Latvia.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, indicating compliance with basic privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts highlight gaps in security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain transparency but does not directly impact site security. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and formalizing incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS registration details to ensure domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA anazana
Description
anaZana provides digital marketing and IT solutions for businesses, including website development, mobile app development, integrations, and automation services. The company targets businesses seeking digital transformation and growth.
Key services
Digital Marketing, Website Development and IT Solutions, Mobile Application Development, Integration and Automation Services, White Label IT System Development, Local Product Search Portals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, HubSpot Analytics, Zendesk Widget, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Ads Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive elements
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not found in public WHOIS
  4. Professional business website with clear contact info and privacy compliance
  5. Use of HubSpot and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing
  6. Cookie consent banner present with granular consent options
  7. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on homepage or footer
  8. Multiple partner and client logos displayed enhancing trust
  9. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies with integration of marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot and Google Tag Manager. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with good content structure and navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical debt observed. The CMS is not explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO and accessibility compliance. The use of multiple external scripts requires ongoing security monitoring to prevent vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cesu1pamatskola.anazana.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cesu1pamatskola.anazana.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.