Skip to main content

Security report for anawe.cz

Anawe s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anawe s.r.o. is a Czech-based small technology service company specializing in web design, SEO optimization, graphic design, corporate identity, and content management systems. The company has a long-standing presence with over a decade of experience and a broad portfolio of client websites, positioning itself as a trusted local provider. Their website reflects a professional approach with detailed references and clear contact information, including company registration data. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies with HTTPS and Google Analytics integration, but lacks modern security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty about domain registration legitimacy, although the business information on the site supports authenticity. Overall, the security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but compliance with privacy regulations could be enhanced. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anawe.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anawe operates primarily in the technology sector, offering essential digital marketing and web development services to businesses and individuals in the Czech Republic. Their business model focuses on service delivery with a strong emphasis on SEO and graphic design. The company demonstrates competitive advantages through its extensive client portfolio and Google Partner certification. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based web development, ongoing SEO services, and content management system licensing or support. The target customer segment includes small to medium enterprises and organizations seeking professional online presence solutions. Growth indicators include a steady stream of new client websites over recent years and partnerships with recognized platforms like Google and Seznam. The company maintains a consistent branding and a professional online presence, though it could benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth posture. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure process, which are important for comprehensive security governance. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerable libraries or insecure forms were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in formalizing policies and enhancing technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and enhance user trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing incident response contact information and security policies on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Anawe s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ28990218
Registration number
28990218
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anawe s.r.o.
Description
Anawe s.r.o. provides comprehensive services for internet and other presentations including website creation, SEO optimization, graphic design, corporate identity, flash games, and content management systems.
Key services
Website creation, SEO optimization, Graphic design, Corporate identity design, Flash games development, Content management and e-commerce systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and detailed client references.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and warrants caution.
  4. Website uses HTTPS and Google Analytics for tracking.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with company registration details.
  6. No signs of adult or malicious content detected.
  7. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  8. Google Partner certification is prominently displayed, indicating marketing credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using classic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript technologies with a proprietary CMS implied by the content. It uses Google Analytics for user tracking and is served over HTTPS, indicating a secure transport layer. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with a clear structure and navigation. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries. The absence of security headers and privacy compliance features suggests technical debt in security and regulatory areas. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site could benefit from modernization efforts including adoption of security best practices, enhanced mobile responsiveness, and improved privacy controls to reduce technical risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anawe.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anawe.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.