Skip to main content

Security report for analyticsmania.com

Analytics Mania · Education · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Analytics Mania is a specialized educational platform focused on Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager training, founded by Julius Fedorovicius in 2016. It offers a range of paid and free courses, consulting services, and maintains active social media communities to support digital marketers and analysts. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with high-quality content tailored to its target audience of marketing and analytics professionals. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools integrated, including Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics, ensuring effective tracking and marketing capabilities. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust verification, but the overall digital footprint and content quality support legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response policies, and verifying domain registration status regularly.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching analyticsmania.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention analyticsmania.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for analyticsmania.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the education and technology sectors, targeting professionals seeking practical analytics skills. Its competitive advantage lies in expert-led, up-to-date courses with hands-on practice and community support. Revenue streams include paid courses and consulting services. The company leverages social proof through testimonials and active Facebook groups, enhancing market presence. The business model is direct-to-consumer online education with additional consulting offerings. Growth indicators include a large student base and continuous content updates. Partnerships appear limited to social media platforms and analytics service providers. Operationally, the company maintains a focused niche with strong content quality and user engagement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting compliance with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggests limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the site is secure for its business type but could benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation to improve trust and compliance readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to prevent vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Monitor domain registration status and consider WHOIS privacy or verification to strengthen domain legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Analytics Mania
Description
A web analytics blog about Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics (and other related stuff) created and constantly updated by Julius Fedorovicius
Key services
Online courses on Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, Consulting and audit services, Free educational resources and guides, Community management on Facebook
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, WPBakery Page Builder, Rank Math SEO, Cloudflare (implied by domain and scripts)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-795697347)
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Strong focus on Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager education
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found, only contact form
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  7. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trust score but content quality is high
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder and Rank Math SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-optimized infrastructure. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses jQuery libraries. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but scripts suggest use of CDN or managed hosting. Technical debt appears low with regular content updates and professional design. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with analyticsmania.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review analyticsmania.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.