Skip to main content

Security report for analyticsindiamag.com

Analytics India Magazine · Technology · India

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Analytics India Magazine (AIM) is a well-established media publication specializing in news, insights, and analysis related to artificial intelligence, machine learning, and analytics. Founded in 2012, AIM has positioned itself as a leading authority in chronicling technological progress in AI, targeting professionals and enthusiasts in the technology sector. The website offers comprehensive content on AI advancements, industry trends, and social-political impacts of analytics technologies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO Premium and Elementor, supported by Google Tag Manager and Gauges Analytics for tracking. The hosting and domain registration are managed by GoDaddy.com, LLC, with domain locks in place to prevent unauthorized changes. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and no explicit privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating room for compliance improvements. Overall, AIM demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong branding and content quality, but should enhance privacy compliance and DNS security to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching analyticsindiamag.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AIM operates in the technology media sector, focusing on AI and analytics news. Its business model revolves around content publication, likely monetized through advertising and sponsored content. The company targets a niche audience of AI professionals, researchers, and enthusiasts, leveraging its long-standing market presence since 2012. The website's structured data and social media integration indicate a strategic approach to digital marketing and audience engagement. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting AIM functions as an independent entity. The company's medium size and consistent branding support its position as a credible information source in the AI domain. Growth opportunities may include expanding compliance transparency and enhancing security disclosures to meet evolving regulatory standards.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Domain registration includes multiple EPP status locks, which protect against unauthorized domain transfers or deletions. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, representing a potential area for improvement. The absence of a security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency in handling security incidents. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which is a best practice for responsible security management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly enhanced by implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and incident reporting.
  5. Enhance incident response readiness by providing dedicated security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Analytics India Magazine
Description
AIM Media House is chronicles of technological progress in the space of analytics, artificial intelligence, and its social and political impact
Key services
AI news, Insights, Analysis, Industry reports
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, Gauges Analytics
Frameworks
Yoast SEO, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Gauges Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Gauges Analytics
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO Premium
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional media publication focused on AI and analytics
  2. Uses modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins for SEO and page building
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on homepage content
  4. Contact information is limited but includes official email and phone in structured data
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected
  7. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap
  8. Website uses HTTPS and has domain locks to prevent unauthorized transfers
  9. Social media presence is strong with official verified accounts linked
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform, utilizing Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO Premium for search engine optimization. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Gauges Analytics for user tracking and analytics. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization with proper meta tags and structured data. Hosting appears to be managed via GoDaddy.com, LLC, inferred from registrar and nameservers. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of third-party scripts and caching. Accessibility features are basic, suggesting opportunities to enhance compliance with accessibility standards. No critical technical vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content, but the lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with analyticsindiamag.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review analyticsindiamag.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.