Skip to main content

Security report for analytics-schweer.de

Technology · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website analytics-schweer.de hosts a Matomo analytics platform login page, providing a free/libre web analytics service. The platform targets website administrators and analytics users who require privacy-focused visitor tracking. The site is self-hosted on Contabo infrastructure and uses HTTPS with support for two-factor authentication, indicating a moderate security posture. However, the site lacks publicly accessible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which limits its compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Contact and incident response information are also absent, reducing transparency and user trust. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks such as AngularJS and Vue.js, with a moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Overall, the site is functional but minimalistic, focusing solely on user authentication for the analytics platform.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching analytics-schweer.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain appears to serve as a self-hosted instance of the Matomo analytics platform, which is an open-source alternative to Google Analytics. The business model is likely service or consultancy-based, targeting clients who prefer data privacy and control over their analytics data. The lack of public business information or contact details suggests this instance may be for private or internal use rather than a commercial-facing website. The hosting on Contabo and use of Matomo software aligns with a small to medium-sized operation focused on technology services. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data.

Security posture

Security measures include enforced HTTPS, two-factor authentication, and token-based authentication mechanisms. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder timely response to security events. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content, and no vulnerable libraries are detected from the provided scripts. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adding security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information and incident response procedures to facilitate security reporting and transparency.
  4. Improve SEO and accessibility features to enhance user experience and site discoverability.
  5. Regularly audit and update the platform and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
free/libre analytics platform
Key services
Web analytics, Visitor tracking, Data privacy focused analytics
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, JavaScript, PHP
Frameworks
AngularJS (ng-app attribute), Vue.js (vue-entry attribute present)
Platforms
Self-hosted web analytics platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (piwik.hasServerDetectedHttps = true)
  • Two-factor authentication supported (2FA references in scripts)
  • Password confirmation required for sensitive actions
  • Token authentication used with limited propagation
  • DoNotTrack support mentioned

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page for Matomo analytics platform.
  2. No public privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  3. No contact information or security incident response details provided.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and supports 2FA for user accounts.
  5. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  6. Content is minimal and focused on user authentication.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with hosting provider.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs a Matomo analytics platform instance using PHP and JavaScript, with AngularJS and Vue.js frameworks evident in the frontend. The hosting provider is Contabo, a known VPS and dedicated server provider. The site uses HTTPS with valid SSL configuration. Performance is moderate with deferred JavaScript loading and basic mobile responsiveness. The site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and accessibility features. No CMS is detected beyond the Matomo platform itself. The technical setup is typical for a self-hosted analytics solution but could benefit from modern security headers and enhanced user interface improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with analytics-schweer.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review analytics-schweer.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.