Skip to main content

Security report for anaensaia.org

AnaEnsaia · Education · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AnaEnsaia is a French alumni association for graduates of ENSAIA, an agricultural engineering school. The website serves as a community hub offering networking, career services, events, and publications to its members. It is well-branded and professionally maintained, targeting alumni and professionals in the agricultural sector. The technical infrastructure uses modern JavaScript libraries and CMS features, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, CSRF protection, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification but the website's content and social presence strongly indicate legitimacy. Overall, AnaEnsaia presents a trustworthy, professional online presence supporting its community effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anaensaia.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention anaensaia.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
18
Employees
0
Customers
18
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for anaensaia.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit alumni association within the education sector, affiliated with the Uniagro federation. Its business model focuses on member engagement through events, publications, and career support services. The website integrates social media and mobile app promotion, indicating a strategy to maintain active community involvement. The presence of official social profiles and partner links to the parent school and federation enhance credibility. The site’s content quality and navigation support user engagement, positioning AnaEnsaia as a key player in its niche alumni market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, CSRF tokens on forms, and hCaptcha integration to prevent automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, and security headers like CSP or HSTS are not evident. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of WHOIS data is a concern but does not directly impact the website’s operational security. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could enhance transparency and header security.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards.
  5. Regularly audit third-party libraries for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AnaEnsaia
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AnaEnsaia
Description
AnaEnsaia is the alumni community of ENSAIA, a French engineering school specializing in agricultural sciences. The site provides information about the association, news, events, career services, and networking groups for graduates.
Key services
Alumni directory and networking, Career center services, Event organization, Publication of a magazine (Planète Agro), Newsletter subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, SweetAlert, intl-tel-input, TinyMCE, Select2, hCaptcha, tarteaucitron (cookie consent)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • hCaptcha anti-bot on newsletter form
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (gtag)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag)
Marketing tools
AddToAny social sharing, Smart App Banner
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French.
  2. Strong focus on alumni community and career services.
  3. Multiple social media integrations with official profiles.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and cookie consent tools.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, and various plugins like SweetAlert, intl-tel-input, TinyMCE, and Select2, indicating a mature but somewhat traditional tech stack. The CMS appears to be NetAssoc, a specialized platform for associations. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and caching. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and smart app banners promoting mobile apps. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. The site could benefit from modern frontend frameworks and enhanced accessibility compliance to reduce technical debt and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anaensaia.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anaensaia.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.