Skip to main content

Security report for amung.us

whos.amung.us Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

whos.amung.us Inc. operates a web analytics platform offering free and pro-tier real-time visitor statistics and heatmap widgets for websites and blogs. The service targets website owners and bloggers seeking immediate insights into visitor behavior without requiring account registration. The company positions itself as an established player in the web analytics market, with a business model centered on free widget usage complemented by paid Pro features. The website content is professionally designed, consistent, and supported by mentions in reputable technology media outlets, indicating moderate market trust and recognition. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Fancybox, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. However, accessibility features are basic and no CMS or hosting provider details are evident. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers are not detected and no explicit security policies are published. From a security and compliance perspective, the site lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR compliance indicators, which could pose privacy compliance risks. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection reduces transparency but is common for this business type. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, limiting the security maturity visibility. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content, but improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency are recommended. Strategically, whos.amung.us should enhance its privacy and security disclosures, implement cookie consent, and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to strengthen trust and compliance. Technical modernization focusing on accessibility and security headers would further improve the security posture and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amung.us

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

whos.amung.us operates in the technology sector providing real-time web analytics widgets primarily targeting website owners and bloggers. The company leverages a freemium business model offering free widgets with no usage limits and a paid Pro tier with advanced analytics features. Their market positioning is supported by media coverage from TechCrunch, Wired, VentureBeat, and Lifehacker, indicating a recognized presence in the analytics niche. Revenue streams likely include Pro subscriptions and advertising. The partnership ecosystem includes media mentions but no direct business partners identified. Growth indicators include extensive widget usage statistics displayed on the site. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence but lacks public WHOIS transparency, which may affect some trust perceptions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, indicating limited formal security governance. Privacy compliance is basic with no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR indicators, which could expose the company to regulatory risks. The lack of contact emails or phone numbers for security incidents further reduces incident response readiness. Overall, the security culture appears informal and could benefit from structured policies and transparency enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish clear security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures.
  4. Establish dedicated security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
whos.amung.us Inc.
Description
Free real-time analytics for your website or blog with customizable widgets and no account required.
Key services
Real-time visitor stats, Heatmaps, Popular pages tracking, Visitor maps, Browser and device analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Fancybox, Animate.css, SweetAlert2, Masonry, Isotope, Fitty, MooTools, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Ads conversion tracking
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-984715850)
Tracking pixels
waust.at
Marketing tools
SweetAlert2
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides free and pro real-time web analytics widgets
  2. No WHOIS data publicly available, indicating privacy protection
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected
  4. Website uses multiple modern JS libraries and frameworks
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers; contact via form only
  6. Mentions media coverage by reputable tech news sites
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policies found
  8. HTTPS is enabled with no mixed content detected
  9. No adult or questionable content present
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature and widely adopted technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Fancybox, Animate.css, SweetAlert2, Masonry, Isotope, Fitty, MooTools, and Google Tag Manager. These technologies support responsive design, animations, and analytics integration. The site loads external resources primarily from CDNs, which aids performance but requires monitoring for supply chain risks. The HTML structure is valid and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility is basic. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident, suggesting a custom or self-hosted solution. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by reducing external dependencies and optimizing scripts. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amung.us. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amung.us.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.