Skip to main content

Security report for amperecomputing.com

Ampere Computing · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ampere Computing is a technology company specializing in cloud native processors designed for efficient and scalable performance in data centers and edge computing environments. Founded in 2017, the company positions itself as a provider of high-efficiency CPUs that meet the growing demands of cloud computing with minimal resource consumption. The website reflects a modern, professional digital presence built on contemporary web frameworks such as Next.js and Chakra UI, hosted on Microsoft Azure infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content focused on their core business offerings. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms via OneTrust, indicating a baseline commitment to privacy compliance. However, explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and security policies are not found, which represents an area for improvement. The WHOIS data shows a consistent domain registration history aligned with the company's founding date, with standard registrar protections but lacking DNSSEC, which could enhance DNS security. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be strengthened by publishing formal security and privacy documentation, adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and enabling DNSSEC. The absence of direct contact information and social media links on the main page limits immediate user engagement and trust signals. The website content is safe, professional, and targeted at a general audience interested in cloud computing technologies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amperecomputing.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ampere Computing operates in the semiconductor and cloud computing sector, focusing on efficient processors for cloud native applications. Their business model is B2B, targeting cloud service providers, data center operators, and enterprises requiring scalable CPU solutions. The company leverages modern web technologies to present its offerings and engages users through marketing automation tools like Autopilot. The lack of visible contact details and social media presence suggests a controlled communication strategy, possibly emphasizing direct business relationships. The domain age and registration details support the company's legitimacy and market presence since 2017. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. Security headers are inferred but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML content, suggesting potential for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML. The absence of a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure page indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended enhancement for domain security. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for strengthening compliance and incident management capabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and trust.
  3. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  4. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security posture.
  5. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options if not already configured at the server level.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ampere Computing
Description
Ampere Computing designs cloud native processors that deliver unmatched efficiency and scalable performance for data centers and edge computing, focusing on minimal resource consumption.
Key services
Cloud native processors, Data center processors, Edge computing CPUs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Chakra UI, Google Fonts, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Autopilot SDK, Microsoft Azure Blob Storage (for images)
Frameworks
Next.js, Chakra UI
Platforms
Azure CDN
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
OneTrust, Autopilot
Marketing tools
Autopilot SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page or metadata.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust with a consent banner.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is well-protected with registrar locks but lacks DNSSEC.
  9. Content is professional and technology-focused, targeting cloud computing and data center markets.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js (React framework) and Chakra UI for styling, hosted on Microsoft Azure CDN infrastructure. It uses Google Fonts and integrates third-party scripts for cookie consent (OneTrust) and marketing automation (Autopilot). The site is optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with preloading of images and deferred script loading. No standard CMS was detected, indicating a custom or proprietary content management approach. The technical implementation is robust with good SEO and accessibility considerations, though explicit security headers and DNSSEC are areas for improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amperecomputing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amperecomputing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.