Skip to main content

Security report for amodit.com

ASTRAFOX Sp. z o. o. · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AMODIT, operated by ASTRAFOX Sp. z o. o., is a mature technology company founded in 2011 specializing in business process digitization and automation. The company offers a comprehensive electronic document workflow platform integrating AI, low-code process design, electronic signatures, and BI reporting. Serving a broad range of industries with over 44,000 users and 1,300+ implemented processes, AMODIT holds a strong market position in Poland and beyond. The platform supports both SaaS and on-premises deployment models, catering to diverse business needs. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and multilingual capabilities, leveraging Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. Security posture is strong, evidenced by ISO 27001 certification and secure form handling, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is robust with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high professionalism, trustworthiness, and digital maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amodit.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AMODIT targets medium to large enterprises seeking to optimize and automate document-centric business processes. Its competitive advantage lies in combining AI-powered OCR, low-code process design, and electronic signature integration within a flexible platform. Revenue streams likely include SaaS subscriptions and on-premises licensing. The company maintains a diverse client base across financial, legal, administrative, and IT sectors, supported by detailed case studies and client testimonials. Strategic partnerships and certifications like ISO 27001 enhance credibility. The business model emphasizes scalability and adaptability, positioning AMODIT well for continued growth in digital transformation markets.

Security posture

AMODIT exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement, spam protection on forms, and ISO 27001 certification. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA mitigates automated abuse risks. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response contact information is not explicitly published, which could be enhanced for transparency. Overall, the platform aligns well with GDPR and industry best practices, supporting secure and compliant operations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance incident response readiness by providing clear security contact channels on the website.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Maintain transparency on data retention policies and user privacy practices to strengthen GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ASTRAFOX Sp. z o. o.
VAT number
PL5252171560
Registration number
REGON: 016263968
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ASTRAFOX Sp. z o. o.
Description
Electronic document workflow with artificial intelligence (AI), low-code platform, electronic signatures, BI reports, and ready-made modules.
Key services
Electronic document workflow, Artificial intelligence (AI) integration, Low-code platform for process design, Electronic signatures, Business Intelligence (BI) reports, Ready-made business process modules
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Slim Select, Country Phone Field Contact Form 7, Contact Form 7, WPML (multilingual CMS)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Spam protection on contact forms
  • ISO 27001 certification
  • Service Level Agreement published

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieYes
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong focus on business process digitization and automation
  3. Multiple client testimonials and case studies enhance trust
  4. Comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms policies present
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  7. Contact information is transparent and complete
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for optimization, WPML for multilingual support, and various plugins for contact forms and spam protection. Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA are integrated for analytics and security. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Hosting appears to be Poland-based, consistent with the business location. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of media assets and script loading. The technical implementation supports a professional and scalable digital presence aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amodit.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amodit.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.