Skip to main content

Security report for ammeon.com

Ammeon · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ammeon is a technology services company specializing in digital transformation, DevOps, Agile methodologies, cloud, and software engineering. The company positions itself as a provider of better and faster software development solutions. Recently, Ammeon has become part of the intive group, expanding its portfolio and capabilities, particularly in telecom, fintech, and mobility sectors. The website reflects a professional B2B service provider targeting businesses seeking digital transformation and software engineering expertise. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, GSAP, and FullPage.js. SEO is enhanced using the Yoast SEO plugin, and analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, indicating some privacy compliance efforts. However, no explicit privacy policy, terms of service, or security policies are found. Security headers are not detected in the HTML content, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. These gaps suggest room for improvement in security posture and compliance. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with moderate risk. Strategic improvements in privacy policy publication, security headers implementation, and incident response transparency would enhance the security and compliance profile significantly.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ammeon.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ammeon operates in the technology sector with a focus on digital transformation and software engineering services. Its business model is B2B, serving enterprises requiring agile and cloud-based software solutions. The recent acquisition by intive strengthens its market position and broadens its service offerings, especially in telecom and fintech verticals. The company leverages partnerships and social media presence to enhance brand visibility. Revenue streams likely include consulting, software development, and managed services. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized company with a professional approach to client engagement and marketing. Growth indicators include integration into a larger group and expanded service portfolio.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is moderate. HTTPS is properly enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, reflecting basic GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, security headers, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in security governance and transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits the ability for external security researchers to report issues responsibly. Overall, the security culture appears nascent and would benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy including dedicated security contact channels.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ammeon
Description
Digital Transformation, Devops, Agile, Cloud and Software Engineering. Develop And Deliver Better Software Faster with Ammeon.com
Key services
Digital Transformation, DevOps, Agile, Cloud, Software Engineering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Bootstrap, GSAP (TweenLite), Waypoints, FullPage.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on homepage
  5. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and WordPress CMS
  6. Business recently merged or acquired by intive group
  7. Social media links present for Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn
  8. No visible security or incident response contact information
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  10. SEO optimized with Yoast plugin and meta tags
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS platform enhanced with Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It incorporates modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Bootstrap for responsive design, GSAP for animations, and FullPage.js for scrolling effects. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for user tracking and marketing analytics. The site loads with moderate speed and has basic mobile responsiveness. There is no explicit hosting provider identified from the HTML content. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from improved accessibility and performance optimizations. No critical technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ammeon.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ammeon.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.