Skip to main content

Security report for amires.eu

AMIRES · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AMIRES is a business focused on supporting strategically oriented innovation to create business impact. The website presents a professional but basic digital presence, primarily using WordPress CMS with standard web technologies such as Google Fonts and Font Awesome icons. The content is business-oriented, targeting innovation stakeholders, but lacks visible contact information and formal privacy or cookie policies. The technical infrastructure is moderate in performance and mobile optimization but lacks advanced security configurations such as security headers. The security posture is minimal with no detected vulnerabilities but also no published security or incident response policies. Overall, the website is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but the absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection limits trust verification. Strategic recommendations include improving transparency with privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and publishing contact and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amires.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AMIRES operates in the technology sector, providing consulting and innovation support services. The business model appears to focus on strategic innovation consulting aimed at business impact. The website targets professional audiences interested in innovation and technology. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies, and the company size is likely small based on website scale. The lack of detailed business information and contact details limits deeper business intelligence insights. The presence of Google Analytics indicates some level of user behavior tracking. The company could benefit from clearer business disclosures and trust signals to enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS (assumed from standard practice though not explicitly confirmed in provided data) but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No forms or input fields were detected in the provided HTML snippet, reducing immediate risk of input-based vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security policy information is published, which may impact readiness for security events. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking but without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from enhanced security controls, transparency, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement and verify HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and enable security headers.
  3. Add visible and secure contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities or outdated components.
  5. Enhance website transparency and trust signals by including certifications, testimonials, and business registrations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AMIRES
Description
SUPPORTING STRATEGICALLY ORIENTED INNOVATION FOR BUSINESS IMPACT
Key services
strategic innovation support, business impact consulting
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Font Awesome 6 Pro, Google Fonts (Poppins), Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection and query failure
  2. Website uses WordPress CMS with Font Awesome and Google Fonts
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage HTML
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in provided HTML
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking
  7. No forms detected in provided HTML snippet
  8. Website content is business-oriented and safe
  9. No WAF or blocking detected, content fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing Google Fonts (Poppins) and Font Awesome 6 Pro icons. Google Analytics is integrated for user tracking. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No modern JavaScript frameworks or advanced backend technologies were detected in the provided HTML snippet. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website but requires modernization and security enhancements to improve resilience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amires.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amires.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.