Skip to main content

Security report for amdocs.com

Amdocs · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Amdocs is a leading enterprise software and services provider specializing in digital network transformation for communications and media companies. The company positions itself as a market leader offering innovative solutions, intelligent operations, and delivery expertise tailored to the telecommunications sector. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design and comprehensive content targeting B2B clients in the communications industry. Technically, the site leverages modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Marketo, and OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating a well-integrated digital marketing infrastructure. The use of Drupal CMS suggests a robust content management approach suitable for enterprise needs. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and a public vulnerability disclosure program, which are recommended for enhanced security posture. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with GDPR, but WHOIS data is missing, which warrants further verification. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure channel.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of amdocs.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amdocs.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention amdocs.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9,165
Employees
662
Customers
5,764
Third parties
2,739
Weak passwords
24%

Latest record dated 2026-06-17 · 1,990 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for amdocs.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –ilvcmng02.corp.amdocs.com2026-06-17
  • –fs.amdocs.com2026-06-17
  • –mfasvc.amdocs.com2026-06-17
  • –pune-portal.amdocs.com2026-06-15
  • –fs.amdocs.com2026-06-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Amdocs operates primarily in the telecommunications and media sectors, providing software and services that enable digital transformation and operational intelligence. Their business model is B2B, focusing on large enterprises and communication service providers. The company demonstrates strong market positioning as a leader in its niche, supported by ISO 27001 certification and comprehensive privacy compliance. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on enterprise clients seeking advanced digital network solutions. Marketing efforts are supported by sophisticated tools like Marketo and Trendemon, suggesting a mature customer engagement strategy. The absence of visible WHOIS data is unusual for a company of this scale and should be investigated to confirm domain ownership and legitimacy.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented via OneTrust, reflecting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security effectiveness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness communication. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which is a best practice for enterprise security. Enhancing these areas would improve the company's security maturity and stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
  5. Continue to maintain GDPR compliance and enhance user privacy controls.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Amdocs
Description
Amdocs is a leading software & services provider to communications & media companies, providing innovative solutions, intelligent operations & delivery expertise.
Key services
digital network transformation, software solutions, intelligent operations, delivery expertise
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Marketo Munchkin, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Trendemon, Marketo RTP, AddToAny sharing, Forms2 JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Marketo, Trendemon
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Marketo RTP, Trendemon
Marketing tools
Marketo, OneTrust
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  3. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program
  4. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools including Marketo and Trendemon
  5. No exposed emails or phone numbers in the HTML snippet, but contact forms and contact page exist
  6. Professional and consistent branding and content quality
  7. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS and integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Trendemon, and OneTrust for cookie consent. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve user experience. The technical stack reflects a modern enterprise-grade infrastructure suitable for a global telecommunications software provider. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and to publish more detailed technical and security documentation to reduce technical debt and enhance operational transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amdocs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amdocs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.