Skip to main content

Security report for ambirewallet.com

Ambire · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ambire is a technology company specializing in a secure, self-custodial Web3 wallet designed for Ethereum and EVM-compatible blockchains. Positioned as a user-governed wallet with advanced features such as transaction batching, hardware wallet support, and cross-chain bridging, Ambire targets cryptocurrency users seeking a reliable and privacy-respecting wallet solution. The company emphasizes security, transparency, and user empowerment through DAO governance and token incentives. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Next.js and React, with a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible design. The presence of Google Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking for analytics purposes. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and open-source audited code, though explicit security headers and a detailed privacy policy are lacking. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but is mitigated by the professional site and community presence. Overall, Ambire presents a credible and technically mature offering in the Web3 wallet space.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ambirewallet.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
82
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ambire operates in the competitive Web3 wallet market, differentiating itself through smart wallet features enabled by EIP-7702, cross-chain capabilities, and user governance via WalletDAO and $WALLET tokens. Its business model revolves around providing a free browser extension with value-added features and community-driven development. The company maintains active engagement across multiple social and community platforms, enhancing its market presence and user trust. Partnerships with security audit platforms like Code4rena reinforce its commitment to security. The lack of physical contact information and WHOIS transparency is common in blockchain startups but should be addressed for broader enterprise adoption. Ambire's growth potential lies in expanding mobile app availability and integrating support for additional blockchains like Bitcoin and Solana.

Security posture

Ambire demonstrates a solid security foundation with open-source, audited code and support for hardware wallets, transaction simulation, and sponsored gas transactions. The website enforces HTTPS and provides a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and a published security policy or incident response page limits transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The company should consider publishing a security.txt file and enhancing privacy policy details to improve compliance and user trust. Overall, Ambire's security posture is strong but can benefit from formalized policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, usage, and retention to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance website security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response page to provide transparency and clear communication channels for vulnerability reporting.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security posture.
  5. Consider providing more detailed business contact information, including physical address and phone numbers, to enhance business credibility and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ambire
Description
Fast, secure, and reliable browser Web3 wallet extension built for the new internet. EIP-7702 ready wallet from day one of Ethereum's Pectra upgrade.
Key services
Web3 wallet extension, Support for Ethereum and EVM chains, Hardware wallet integration, Transaction batching, Gas fee payment in multiple tokens, Sponsored gas transactions, Onchain transaction simulation, NFT and DeFi tracking, Built-in token swap and cross-chain bridge
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (implied by Next.js usage), Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Chrome Web Store extension, JSON-LD structured data
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web, Browser extension (Chrome, Firefox)
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Open-source audited code
  • No tracking scripts detected beyond Google Tag Manager
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and highly relevant to Web3 wallet users.
  3. Strong presence of social media and community engagement links.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses found on the site.
  5. Privacy policy page not found or not linked explicitly; cookie policy and consent are implemented.
  6. Security headers not explicitly detected in provided data; HTTPS is used.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual but not uncommon for blockchain-related projects.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. The use of Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager is standard for styling and analytics. The site is well-structured with comprehensive JSON-LD structured data for organization and software application, aiding SEO and rich search results. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the site uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificates. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. Performance is fast with preloading and preconnecting optimizations. Accessibility and SEO are well addressed with proper meta tags, alt attributes, and semantic HTML. Technical risks are minimal, but adding security headers and improving privacy documentation would reduce potential attack surface and compliance risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ambirewallet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ambirewallet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.