Skip to main content

Security report for amber-studios.com

Amber Studios (SACCO SIA) · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Amber Studios is a technology-focused company specializing in live dealer studio management services with a global footprint of over 100 tables. The company offers tailored solutions to live casino operators, emphasizing fixed fee pricing and no revenue share, positioning itself as a reliable partner in the gaming industry. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence built on WordPress with multilingual support and modern user experience features. Security measures include HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA integration, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, reflecting good privacy compliance and user protection. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, with no critical security issues detected.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of amber-studios.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amber-studios.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Amber Studios operates in the live casino technology sector, targeting operators needing studio management services. Its business model focuses on operational excellence with 24/7 services, fixed fees, and no GGR percentage, which may appeal to cost-conscious partners. The company maintains partnerships with various gaming technology providers and promotes career opportunities across multiple countries, indicating growth and international reach. The website content and partner logos reinforce its market position as a specialized service provider with a strong brand identity and customer focus.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms to mitigate spam and bot attacks, and a detailed cookie consent framework supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options were not visible and should be verified at the server level. Incident response and security policy pages are not present, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader compliance.
  4. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to build trust with partners and users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Amber Studios (SACCO SIA)
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Amber Studios (SACCO SIA)
Description
Amber Studios provides live dealer studio management services with over 100 tables worldwide, offering tailored solutions for partners in the live casino industry.
Key services
Live Dealer Studio Management, 1b.live services, LED Studio services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, LinkedIn Insight Tag, CookieYes Consent Management
Frameworks
Bold Page Builder, TranslatePress Multilingual
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Bold Page Builder and TranslatePress for multilingual support
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user controls
  3. Contact form uses Contact Form 7 with Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, and Instagram
  5. Business targets live dealer studio management with global operations
  6. No critical security issues or WAF blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bold Page Builder and TranslatePress for multilingual capabilities, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. It integrates Google reCAPTCHA and LinkedIn Insight Tag for security and analytics respectively. Performance is moderate with lazy loading for images and a video background implemented via YouTube player. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks include dependency on multiple third-party scripts and potential lack of advanced security headers. Overall, the technical implementation supports business goals effectively with opportunities for optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amber-studios.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amber-studios.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.