Skip to main content

Security report for altera.co

Altera sp. z o.o. · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Altera sp. z o.o. operates a SaaS platform focused on automating document workflows and financial controls for small and medium-sized businesses, primarily in Poland. The company has established a solid market presence with over 1000 clients and offers key services including electronic document circulation, payment automation, financial controlling, invoicing, and communication tools. The website is professionally designed, bilingual (Polish and English), and demonstrates a clear business model targeting efficiency and automation in finance management. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for consent management. Hosting and DNS are managed via reputable providers, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. The site includes standard SEO and accessibility features, though accessibility is basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses Cloudflare DNS, and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers like CSP and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved. The domain is privacy protected, which is justified for this business type, and the WHOIS data aligns with the company's profile. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with good business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic improvements in security policy transparency and DNS security would enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching altera.co

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention altera.co, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
11
Employees
0
Customers
11
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for altera.co.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Altera positions itself as a technology-driven finance automation provider targeting SMEs in Poland. Its SaaS model generates revenue through subscription pricing based on the number of companies, users, and document processing tiers. The company emphasizes ease of onboarding, intuitive interfaces, and comprehensive financial control features. The presence of a status page and active blog indicates ongoing customer engagement and transparency. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified. The company maintains active social media channels and showcases client logos to build trust. Growth indicators include a modern website, active content marketing, and a clear pricing calculator. The business model relies on recurring revenue from SaaS subscriptions with tiered pricing. The target audience is primarily Polish-speaking SMEs seeking to digitize and automate financial and document workflows. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its integrated platform combining document management, payment automation, and financial controlling with a user-friendly interface and rapid deployment.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and domain status flags prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, and Cloudflare DNS provides DNS-level protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact, limiting transparency for security incidents. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which could improve responsible vulnerability reporting. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of modern libraries and frameworks reduces risk. Overall, the site follows basic security best practices but could enhance its posture with additional headers, DNSSEC, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Altera sp. z o.o.
Registration number
0000855858
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Altera sp. z o.o.
Description
Automatyzacja finansów i elektroniczny obieg dokumentów, które działają od pierwszego dnia – szybko, prosto, skutecznie.
Key services
Electronic Document Workflow, Payment Automation and Debt Collection, Financial Controlling, Sales Invoicing, Communication Tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cloudflare DNS, Cookiebot, Google Fonts, jQuery
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Cloudflare
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer/delete/renew/update prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and Turnstile CAPTCHA

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Polish with English option.
  3. Clear business focus on document and finance automation SaaS.
  4. Multiple trust signals including client logos and social media.
  5. Good technical implementation with modern tools and hosting.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and consent mechanism active.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
  9. Domain uses privacy protection but is consistent with business type.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, hosted on Webflow's infrastructure with Cloudflare DNS services. It uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads quickly with optimized images and responsive design for mobile devices. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting good SEO and accessibility standards, though accessibility features are basic. The use of asynchronous loading for scripts and preconnect hints improves performance. The site integrates a pricing calculator implemented in JavaScript with debounced input handling for user interaction. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented, supporting a professional SaaS offering.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with altera.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review altera.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.