Skip to main content

Security report for almainsights.fi

Alma Insights · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alma Insights is a Finnish technology company specializing in providing digital data, content, and marketplace services to organizations. Their website emphasizes delivering valuable insights through accurate data at the right time, targeting business clients seeking digital transformation and data-driven decision-making. The company appears to be medium-sized and operates primarily in Finland. Technically, the website is built using modern React and Gatsby frameworks, hosted likely on WPEngine, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance perception. Security-wise, HTTPS is properly implemented, but additional security headers and policies are absent, suggesting room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer contact information to improve user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of almainsights.fi. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching almainsights.fi

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention almainsights.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for almainsights.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Alma Insights positions itself as a provider of digital data and content services, focusing on generating actionable insights for organizations. Their business model revolves around leveraging data and digital marketplaces to create value for clients. The absence of explicit market positioning or certifications on the site suggests a focus on organic growth and service quality. The company targets organizational clients, likely in sectors requiring data analytics and digital content solutions. The use of modern web technologies and hosting indicates a commitment to digital maturity. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the provided data. The company could enhance its market presence by publishing more detailed business information and certifications.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to good security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are visible, which may hinder transparency and incident management readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Strengthening security headers, publishing security policies, and providing incident response contacts would significantly improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Establish and disclose a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance transparency by including certifications, security frameworks adherence, and data protection officer contact details.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alma Insights
Description
Alma Insights tarjoaa organisaatiolle digitaalisia data-, sisältö- ja markkinapaikkapalveluita. Tuotamme oikealla tiedolla arvoa tuottavia oivalluksia.
Key services
digital data services, content services, marketplace services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby 5.10.0, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page HTML.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  4. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Website uses modern React and Gatsby technologies with good SEO and mobile optimization.
  6. Security posture is good with HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and policies.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. Content is professional and business-focused, targeting organizations needing digital data and content services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack using React and Gatsby, which supports fast loading times and good SEO practices. Hosting appears to be managed via WPEngine, a reputable managed WordPress hosting provider, although the site itself is Gatsby-based. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with a clean design and clear navigation. However, there is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts in the provided HTML, which may indicate minimal user tracking or that such scripts are loaded dynamically elsewhere. The absence of security headers and privacy-related scripts suggests technical debt in compliance and security best practices. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhancements in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100 −1Medium34 findingsView report
  2. 59/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with almainsights.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review almainsights.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.