Skip to main content

Security report for allyable.com

Allyable · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Allyable is a technology company specializing in AI-powered digital accessibility solutions designed for enterprise organizations. Their platform offers a comprehensive suite of tools including accessibility audits, developer tools, training academies, and integrations to help businesses comply with accessibility standards such as WCAG, ADA, Section 508, and others. Positioned as an industry expert-backed solution, Allyable targets enterprise teams aiming to embed accessibility into their digital customer journey effectively. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and HubSpot. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain registration protections, though some improvements like DNSSEC and security headers could enhance it further. Privacy compliance is currently basic, lacking explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, Allyable presents a credible, professional, and trustworthy digital accessibility service provider with room to improve privacy transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of allyable.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allyable.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Allyable operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital accessibility compliance and AI-driven solutions. Their business model is SaaS-based, offering modular tools and knowledge resources to enterprise clients. The company leverages AI to differentiate itself in the accessibility market, providing automation and integration capabilities that appeal to development, compliance, and management teams. Their market positioning is strengthened by customer testimonials, ISO 27001 certification, and a clear focus on legal and practical accessibility needs. The absence of privacy policies and incident response details suggests an opportunity to build greater trust and compliance maturity. The company appears to be medium-sized, founded in 2019, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. Their partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed in the content provided.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain registration locks to prevent unauthorized changes, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represent gaps that could expose the site to certain attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The use of trusted third-party analytics and marketing scripts is balanced with the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, which may raise compliance concerns under GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, limiting transparency in security operations. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies including GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement and enable DNSSEC to secure DNS infrastructure.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve incident response transparency.
  5. Enhance contact information with dedicated security and incident response contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Allyable
Description
The AI-powered platform created by industry experts to help enterprise teams shift left and design with digital accessibility in mind.
Key services
Digital Accessibility Hub, Accessibility Academy, Developer Tools for Accessibility, AI-powered Accessibility Audits, Source Code Accessibility Validation, Accessible Captions, Document Accessibility, Integrations with CMS platforms
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Elementor 3.30.0, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot collected forms, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Easy Notification Bar plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)
  • Use of security and analytics scripts from trusted providers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional, enterprise-focused digital accessibility platform.
  2. Strong use of AI and modern web technologies.
  3. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected in the provided content.
  5. Contact information is primarily phone and contact forms; no direct emails found.
  6. Security policies and certifications are mentioned but not linked explicitly.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. Multiple trusted analytics and marketing tools integrated.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building, supported by Yoast SEO for optimization. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Analytics, HubSpot forms and analytics, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses standard web fonts and responsive design techniques. Technical debt appears low, but enabling DNSSEC and security headers would reduce risk. The site is hosted likely via GoDaddy given the registrar and DNS servers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence suitable for enterprise clients.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allyable.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allyable.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.