Skip to main content

Security report for allurity.com

Allurity · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Allurity is a European cybersecurity services group founded in 2014, specializing in tech-enabled cybersecurity solutions and growth partnerships for entrepreneurs and talent. The company positions itself as a leader in the cybersecurity industry with recent acquisitions to strengthen its market presence. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand with clear messaging focused on enabling a safe digital world. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frontend libraries and SEO optimizations, delivering a good user experience with mobile responsiveness and performance. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS, uses Google reCAPTCHA for forms, and provides cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the domain registration and website content align well, indicating a trustworthy and legitimate business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allurity.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Allurity operates in the technology sector, specifically cybersecurity services, targeting organizations needing advanced security solutions and cybersecurity professionals. Their business model includes service provision and strategic acquisitions to expand capabilities and market reach. The company demonstrates growth through acquisitions of Infigo IS, Onevinn, and Security Research Labs, indicating an aggressive expansion strategy. Their partnership ecosystem is focused on integrating best-in-class specialists and supporting progressive entrepreneurs. The company maintains a professional online presence with active news updates and a clear career focus, signaling ongoing growth and talent acquisition.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms. Cookie consent is implemented to comply with privacy regulations. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers like Content-Security-Policy, and a published security policy or incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The company would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and enhancing HTTP security headers to improve defense-in-depth and compliance readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  5. Consider adding phone contact information to improve trust and accessibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Allurity
Description
Allurity is a group of tech-enabled cybersecurity service providers, comprised of best-in-class specialists with a common purpose to enable a safe digital world. They are the chosen growth partner for progressive entrepreneurs and talent, aiming to develop the industry and support companies in reaching their full potential.
Key services
Cybersecurity services, Offensive security, Growth partnership for cybersecurity companies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 4, Google Fonts, Swiper.js, GSAP, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on cybersecurity services and growth partnerships.
  3. Recent news and acquisitions indicate active business development.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No phone numbers found; contact primarily via email and contact form.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  8. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  9. No terms of service page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 4 for responsive design, Google Fonts for typography, and modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js and GSAP for interactive elements. Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight tags are used for analytics and marketing. The hosting provider is One.com A/S, consistent with WHOIS data. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading implemented, though some images show loading errors which could be improved. SEO is well addressed via Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website with room for optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allurity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allurity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.