Skip to main content

Security report for allockate.com

Allockate · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Allockate is a technology company specializing in self-service access management platforms tailored for self-storage, rental, and retail industries. Founded in 2022, it offers a modular and affordable solution combining hardware and cloud-based software to enable keyless access, booking, payment, and notifications. The company positions itself as a flexible and easy-to-integrate platform targeting businesses seeking efficient access control solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, leveraging modern web technologies and SEO best practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and reCAPTCHA integration, though improvements like DNSSEC and enhanced security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy, reflecting GDPR awareness. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, supporting the company's business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allockate.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Allockate operates in the technology sector with a focus on transportation and retail access solutions. Its business model revolves around providing both hardware and software as a service, enabling clients to manage access remotely and securely. The company targets B2B customers in self-storage, trailer rental, and industrial retail locker markets. Its modular approach allows customization and scalability, which is a competitive advantage. The presence of subdomains for trailers and IoT platform login indicates a growing ecosystem. Social media engagement and SEO optimization suggest active marketing efforts. The domain age and WHOIS data align with a legitimate startup profile. No direct revenue streams or parent company information are disclosed, indicating a standalone small enterprise.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some recommended security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) indicates room for improvement. No security policy or incident response information is publicly available, which could hinder trust in case of security incidents. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The domain registration is secured with clientDeleteProhibited status, reducing risk of hijacking. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small technology company but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Allockate
Description
Allockate is the ultimate self-service access platform for self-storage, rental and retail solutions. Easy integration, cost-effective.
Key services
Self-service access platform, Hardware and software integration, Cloud-based access control, Booking, payment, and notification tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Divi Theme 4.23.4, Google Fonts (Open Sans, Poppins, Roboto), Google reCAPTCHA, Yoast SEO plugin, Burst Statistics plugin, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
WordPress, Divi
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Burst Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Divi theme and SEO plugins
  2. Clear business focus on self-service access management for storage, rental, and retail
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy present, indicating GDPR awareness
  4. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security issues in HTML content
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact likely via forms
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram linked
  7. No terms of service or security policy pages found
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap
  10. SSL is enabled and configured properly
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, which provides a flexible and visually appealing design. It uses Google Fonts and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and SEO optimization. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile-optimized with good accessibility basics. The use of Yoast SEO plugin indicates attention to search engine visibility. The hosting appears to be via GoDaddy, consistent with the registrar information. The site uses reCAPTCHA for form security and has a cookie consent banner for privacy compliance. Technical debt is minimal, but enabling DNSSEC and improving security headers would enhance the technical robustness. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allockate.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allockate.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.