Skip to main content

Security report for allgpts.co

Chipp.ai · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AllGPTs.co is a technology-focused online directory and marketplace listing over 30,000 GPT tools, updated daily with new entries. It is positioned as the world's leading GPT directory, targeting users interested in AI assistants and GPT-based tools. The site is powered by Chipp.ai, which appears to be the parent company, providing a marketplace and submission platform integrated with the directory. The business is relatively new, founded in 2023, and operates primarily in the US market. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Unicorn Platform, Alpine.js, Stripe for payments, and Google services for fonts and identity. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanism. No direct contact information or security incident response details are provided, which limits transparency. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and compliance measures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of allgpts.co. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allgpts.co

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention allgpts.co, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for allgpts.co right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on providing a comprehensive GPT tool directory and marketplace, monetizing likely through marketplace transactions and possibly advertising or premium listings. The target audience includes AI enthusiasts, developers, and businesses seeking GPT tools. The partnership with Chipp.ai strengthens its market position and service offering. The site demonstrates growth potential given the rapid addition of new GPTs and a large catalog. However, the lack of visible contact and compliance documentation may impact trust with enterprise clients. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for startups but should be balanced with transparent business information. The ecosystem includes integrations with Stripe for payments and Google services for authentication, indicating a modern SaaS approach.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no DNSSEC is enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others are not detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. Forms and inputs appear minimal and use deferred scripts, reducing attack surface. Absence of privacy and cookie policies and no incident response contacts indicate compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in headers, DNS security, and documented policies to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Provide clear contact information including support and security incident response channels to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Chipp.ai
Description
AllGPTs is a directory listing over 30,000 GPTs, adding up to 100 new GPTs daily, sorted by popularity to help users find GPTs quickly. It is powered by Chipp.ai and offers a marketplace and submission options for GPTs.
Key services
GPT directory listing, Marketplace exploration, GPT submission
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Unicorn Platform, Alpine.js, Stripe.js, Google Fonts, Google Identity Services
Frameworks
Unicorn Platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of client-side scripts deferred

Analytics and tracking

Services
MarsX Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
analytic-api.marsx.dev
Marketing tools
Stripe, Google Identity Services
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a comprehensive GPT directory with a large number of listings.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on main page.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and external services for analytics and payments.
  5. Domain uses privacy protection but is registered with a reputable registrar.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Unicorn Platform CMS with modern JavaScript frameworks like Alpine.js and uses Stripe for payment processing. It loads resources from reputable CDNs and Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and CDN usage. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and semantic HTML enhancements. The domain is hosted with GoDaddy DNS and uses privacy protection for WHOIS. No CMS-specific vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. The technical infrastructure supports scalability but should enhance security configurations and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 56/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allgpts.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allgpts.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.