Skip to main content

Security report for allbridge.io

Allbridge · Technology · Ukraine

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Allbridge is a technology company specializing in cross-chain token bridging and stablecoin swapping services, targeting cryptocurrency users and blockchain developers. The company positions itself as a secure and fast solution provider in the decentralized finance ecosystem. Founded in 2021 and based in Ukraine, Allbridge operates a modern Angular-based website with a focus on user experience and technical robustness. The platform leverages Cloudflare for domain registration and DNS services, ensuring reliable hosting and security. The website includes cookie consent mechanisms and integrates analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight for marketing and user behavior tracking. However, explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and security policies are not found in the scanned content, which represents an area for improvement. The domain registration details are consistent with the company's branding and business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allbridge.io

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention allbridge.io, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for allbridge.io right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Allbridge operates in the blockchain technology sector, providing essential infrastructure for token interoperability across multiple blockchains. Its business model revolves around liquidity pools and bridging services, catering to DeFi users and stablecoin traders. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and uses modern web technologies to engage its audience. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified in the scanned data. The company’s market position is that of a specialized cross-chain bridge provider, competing in a growing and competitive DeFi market. The absence of direct contact information and formal legal documents on the website may limit user trust and regulatory compliance visibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare as a registrar, which adds a layer of security and reliability. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of DNSSEC, absence of explicit security headers in the HTML, and missing published security policies or incident response contacts suggest room for improvement in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main website.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide a security policy page including incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program and publishing a security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Allbridge
Description
Allbridge offers a cross-chain bridge for tokens based on a liquidity pool focused on security and speed, enabling transfer of ERC20, BEP20 and other tokens across blockchains.
Key services
Cross-chain token bridging, Stablecoin swapping
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 13, Scully (static site generator), Swiper.js (carousel), Google Tag Manager, Consentmanager.net (cookie consent), Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Consentmanager.net
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional blockchain technology platform focused on cross-chain token bridging.
  2. Content is well structured and relevant to the business domain.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the scanned content.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented and functional.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page content.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and transparency of the domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 13 with Scully for static site generation, indicating a modern and maintainable tech stack. It uses Swiper.js for UI components and integrates Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight for analytics and marketing. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing robust infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing scripts and assets. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allbridge.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allbridge.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.