Skip to main content

Security report for alkom.cz

Alkom Security, a.s. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alkom Security, a.s. is a Czech Republic-based company specializing in security and low-voltage systems, operating since 1991. The company positions itself as a market leader offering comprehensive security solutions including installation, remote monitoring, and servicing for residential, commercial, and high-risk clients. Their services also extend to data cabling and mechanical security consulting. The website reflects a mature business with consistent branding and detailed service descriptions, targeting both individual homeowners and institutional clients. Technically, the site is built on WordPress hosted on WordPress.com, utilizing Jetpack for security and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though incident response and security policies are not explicitly published. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR basics, though improvements in privacy and security transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alkom.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector focused on security systems, serving a diverse client base including private residences, businesses, institutions, and housing cooperatives. Their business model combines product sales, installation, and ongoing monitoring services, indicating recurring revenue streams. The long domain age and detailed service offerings suggest established market presence and competitive advantage in the Czech market. The website's integration with WordPress.com services and Jetpack indicates a reliance on managed hosting and security tools, which supports operational efficiency. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content. The company emphasizes compliance with GDPR, reflecting awareness of regulatory requirements. The presence of a career page and blog indicates active engagement and content marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Use of Jetpack plugin suggests some level of security hardening and monitoring. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. The site does not implement a cookie consent banner, which is a GDPR compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure full GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Alkom Security, a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alkom Security, a.s.
Description
Lídr na trhu bezpečnostních a slaboproudých systémů již od roku 1991. Doporučuje a dodává optimální a kvalitní zabezpečovací systémy včetně odborné instalace a servisu. Zajišťuje trvalý dálkový dohled objektů s vyrozuměním majitele či výjezdem zásahové skupiny. Dále zajišťuje slaboproudé rozvody jako datové sítě a domácí telefony. Poskytuje služby pro rodinné domy, byty, firmy, instituce, rizikové objekty a SVJ/družstva.
Key services
security system installation, remote monitoring (ARC-PCO), servicing and maintenance, mechanical security consulting, data and communication cabling, access control systems, video surveillance, home video intercoms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack, PHP, JavaScript, CSS, Google Maps iframe
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress.com hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of WordPress security plugins (Jetpack)

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
wordpress.com stats pixel
Marketing tools
Jetpack, WordPress.com subscription/reader
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie banners found, but GDPR page exists.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No visible security.txt or incident response info.
  5. Uses WordPress.com hosting and Jetpack plugin for security and analytics.
  6. No suspicious external links or domains detected.
  7. No advertising networks detected beyond WordPress.com services.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform hosted on WordPress.com, leveraging Jetpack for security and analytics. The tech stack includes standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and PHP. The site uses Google Maps iframe for location display and Gravatar for user avatars. Performance is moderate with some CSS and JS minification observed. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. The reliance on WordPress.com hosting provides stability but limits some advanced customizations. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a medium-sized business website but has room for modernization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alkom.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alkom.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.