Skip to main content

Security report for alixon.ch

alixon gmbh · Technology · Switzerland

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

alixon gmbh is a Swiss-based small IT solutions company specializing in software and internet services such as address management, reservation systems, cloud solutions, and web hosting. Established in 2000, it serves primarily local businesses and organizations with a focus on personalized consulting and tailored software solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and product offerings. Technically, the site uses Ext JS framework and a custom CMS, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate but lacks advanced security headers and published privacy or cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. Remote support is offered via AnyDesk, enhancing customer service capabilities. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alixon.ch

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention alixon.ch, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for alixon.ch right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche market in Switzerland providing specialized IT solutions for data and reservation management, targeting small to medium enterprises and organizations such as hostels and educational institutions. Its business model is service-oriented with revenue from software products, cloud services, and hosting. The partnership ecosystem includes several related web service domains, indicating a collaborative approach. The company emphasizes personal service and has maintained consistent operations since 2000. Growth indicators include diversified product offerings and remote support capabilities. The absence of social media presence and limited marketing tools suggest a focus on direct client relationships rather than broad digital marketing.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected. The presence of a login form without visible advanced protections and lack of privacy and cookie policies indicate compliance and security gaps. Tracking via leadforensics is present, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing disclosures. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not found. The company should prioritize implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing vulnerability disclosure processes to improve security posture and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to meet GDPR requirements.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Ensure all forms, especially login forms, have CSRF protection and input validation.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
alixon gmbh
Registration number
CHE-109.591.890
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
alixon gmbh
Description
alixon gmbh is a small Swiss IT solutions company based in Aarau, Switzerland, offering software and internet services including address management, reservation systems, room management, website programming, cloud services, web hosting, and managed servers. The company has been operating since 2000 and emphasizes personal and competent consulting and implementation of projects in software, internet applications, and content management systems.
Key services
Address management system, Reservation and room management systems, Website programming and hosting, Cloud data solutions, Managed servers, Remote support via AnyDesk
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Ext JS (Ext Core), JavaScript, HTML5, CSS, MD5.js (for hashing), AnyDesk remote support integration
Frameworks
Ext JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Password-protected address database mentioned
  • Remote support via AnyDesk with explicit download links

Analytics and tracking

Services
leadforensics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
leadforensics
Marketing tools
leadforensics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with emails, phone, and physical address.
  4. The site uses Ext JS framework and custom CMS.
  5. Remote support is offered via AnyDesk with direct download links.
  6. Tracking via leadforensics is present but no major ad networks detected.
  7. No social media links found in the content.
  8. Security headers and advanced security measures are lacking.
  9. Business information is transparent and consistent with WHOIS data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS using Ext JS framework with JavaScript and CSS. It includes interactive sliders and remote support integration via AnyDesk. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. SEO is basic with minimal meta keywords and descriptions. No modern CMS like WordPress or Drupal detected. Hosting provider is not identified from the content. The site uses a tracking pixel from leadforensics for visitor analytics. Technical debt is moderate due to lack of modern security practices and missing compliance documentation. Opportunities exist to modernize security, improve accessibility, and enhance SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alixon.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alixon.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.