Skip to main content

Security report for aliter.com

Aliter Technologies · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aliter Technologies is a Slovakia-based technology company specializing in information technology solutions for defense, security, and critical infrastructure sectors. The company offers a broad portfolio of services including ICT and cloud services, cybersecurity, tactical communication, drones and unmanned systems, software and hardware development, and mission-critical broadband networks. Their market position is reinforced by multiple international certifications and security clearances, indicating a strong focus on compliance and quality. The website content is professionally presented, targeting government and security organizations, with a business-to-business model. The company has been operational since 2000, serving clients internationally with a medium-sized organizational footprint. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Laravel Livewire, Lottie animations, and Flickity carousels, integrated with analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates good performance and accessibility standards. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and GDPR-aligned privacy policies. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and provides a vulnerability disclosure policy with clear contact channels. Certifications such as ISO 27001 and AQAP 2110 highlight a mature security posture. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a security.txt file suggests room for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence aligned with the company's business focus. The main risk factor is the lack of publicly available WHOIS domain registration data, which slightly reduces trustworthiness but does not outweigh the strong business and security indicators. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and verifying domain registration details to improve transparency and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aliter.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aliter Technologies operates in a niche market serving defense and security sectors with specialized IT solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive service offerings, international certifications, and security clearances that enable them to serve sensitive government and military clients. The business model is B2B with a focus on long-term contracts and tailored solutions. Revenue streams likely include software and hardware sales, consulting, managed services, and custom development. The company targets government agencies, military, emergency services, and critical infrastructure operators. Growth indicators include recent awards and international client references. The partnership with 3cis.com for broadband networks expands their ecosystem. The company maintains a strong brand presence with consistent messaging and professional content.

Security posture

The security maturity of Aliter Technologies is high, supported by ISO 27001 certification and AQAP 2110 compliance. The website enforces HTTPS and provides a clear vulnerability disclosure policy with a dedicated contact email. Cookie consent mechanisms are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were detected in the website content. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. Incident response readiness is indicated by the vulnerability disclosure page but could be enhanced with a security.txt file. Overall, the security culture appears mature but can benefit from additional technical controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a security.txt file at the root of the domain to standardize vulnerability reporting.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance incident response documentation and make it publicly accessible to build trust.
  5. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve transparency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aliter Technologies
Description
Information technology for critical infrastructure. Software, hardware, consulting and data infrastructure for the most difficult conditions.
Key services
ICT and Cloud Services, Cybersecurity, Tactical Communication, Drones and Unmanned Systems, Software Development, Hardware Development, Mission Critical Broadband Networks
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Livewire (Laravel), Lottie animations, Flickity carousel, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, Cookies Správně (cookie consent)
Frameworks
Laravel Livewire
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • Vulnerability disclosure policy
  • Contact for reporting security issues

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with rich content focused on defense and security IT solutions.
  2. Strong emphasis on certifications and security compliance.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy mechanisms implemented.
  4. Multiple social media and external links to trusted platforms.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trust score but business presence is strong.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack centered around Laravel Livewire for dynamic content rendering, supported by JavaScript libraries such as Lottie for animations and Flickity for carousels. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast with preloading and asynchronous script loading. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include missing security headers and reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aliter.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aliter.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.