Skip to main content

Security report for algopine.com

Algopine · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Algopine is a specialized technology company providing data science, machine learning, and AI-driven predictive software services primarily targeting e-commerce, retail, and industrial sectors. Their offerings include demand forecasting, personalized recommendations, price elasticity modeling, and custom AI projects leveraging large language models and other advanced techniques. The company positions itself as a niche provider with a strong focus on delivering practical, data-driven solutions to optimize business operations for large clients. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and mobile-optimized, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern web standards and custom analytics, though it lacks some advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, but could be improved with additional policies and headers. Privacy compliance is addressed with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, Algopine demonstrates a credible and trustworthy online presence with room for enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching algopine.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Algopine operates in the technology sector with a focus on AI and machine learning solutions for e-commerce and retail clients. Their business model is B2B, offering both software services and custom projects. The company leverages advanced AI technologies including LLMs to provide innovative solutions such as multi-label text classification and visual product search. Testimonials and case studies indicate satisfied clients and successful integrations. The company appears small but specialized, founded in 2018, with no public parent or subsidiary affiliations. The lack of phone or physical address information suggests a lean or remote operation. The presence of a careers page indicates growth potential. Algopine's competitive advantage lies in its technical expertise and tailored AI solutions for complex retail challenges.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status clientTransferProhibited to protect domain ownership. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) were detected, representing an opportunity for improved defense-in-depth. The site includes a cookie consent banner aligned with GDPR requirements, but lacks published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of a custom analytics service (tinyvisits.com) is minimal and privacy-conscious. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from formalized policies, enhanced headers, and DNSSEC activation to raise trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  5. Consider adopting a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Algopine
Description
Builds, engineers, and runs predictive software services and APIs using data science, machine learning, and large language models (LLMs) for e-commerce, retail, and industry clients.
Key services
Demand planning & sale forecasting, Personalized product recommendations, Price elasticity modeling, Multi-label text tag prediction with LLMs, Language test proficiency prediction, Statistical sale likelihood modeling, Visual product search, Warehouse batch picking and routing optimisation, IoT real-time sensor data collection, PPC Ad analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, XMLHttpRequest, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
tinyvisits.com
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
tinyvisits.com
Marketing tools
tinyvisits.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and consistent branding and content.
  3. Clear focus on AI/ML solutions for e-commerce and retail.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with clear privacy policy link.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses found on the site.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policies published.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. Use of a lightweight custom analytics service (tinyvisits.com).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern HTML5 and CSS, using JavaScript for interactivity and a custom lightweight analytics solution. No CMS or major frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured for SEO. Hosting appears to be managed via NameCheap DNS servers, consistent with the registrar. Performance is moderate with no obvious bottlenecks. The absence of advanced frameworks or CMS reduces attack surface but may limit scalability. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements and formal documentation would improve overall maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with algopine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review algopine.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.