Skip to main content

Security report for alexhost.md

AlexHost SRL · Technology · Moldova

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AlexHost SRL is a Moldova-based hosting provider established in 2008, offering a wide range of hosting services including shared hosting, VPS, dedicated servers, GPU hosting, and domain registration. The company targets individuals and businesses seeking affordable and reliable hosting solutions with a focus on ultra-fast server response times and 99.9% uptime. Their market position is that of a regional hosting provider with a consistent brand and a professional online presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Trustpilot Reviews, and uses Cloudflare DNS services. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating compliance gaps. Contact information is comprehensive with multiple channels including phone, email, support tickets, and Telegram chat. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alexhost.md

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
65
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AlexHost SRL operates in the technology sector as a hosting provider with a business model focused on offering a broad portfolio of hosting services tailored to various customer needs, including specialized hosting for CMS platforms and trading. Their revenue streams likely include hosting subscriptions, domain registrations, SSL certificates, and managed services. The company maintains a multi-language website to serve a diverse audience. Their partnership ecosystem includes social media presence and integration with Trustpilot for reviews. Growth indicators include recent additions of GPU hosting and trading VPS services. Strategic observations suggest a focus on regional market leadership with potential to expand compliance and security offerings to enhance customer trust.

Security posture

The security maturity level of AlexHost SRL is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces the overall security posture. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of third-party scripts like Trustpilot is noted but without detailed data protection disclosures. The company should prioritize implementing security best practices and compliance documentation to improve its security culture and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden website security.
  4. Publish a security policy and provide dedicated incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AlexHost SRL
Description
AlexHost SRL - Hosting provider in Moldova (MD) ⚡ Best & Cheap Hosting ✓ Ultra-fast servers response times. Low Cost for VPS & Dedicated servers ✓ 99.9% uptime advanced ★ Data Center & Managed hosting Services 2022 ☎ +373 796 00 002.
Key services
Shared Hosting, VPS Hosting (Linux, Windows, Managed, Unmanaged), Dedicated Servers, GPU Hosting (AI, Deep Learning, Machine Learning), Domain registration, SSL Certificates, VPN Services, Colocation, DMCA Protected Hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Cloudflare DNS, Yoast SEO, Autoptimize, Trustpilot Reviews plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS servers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Trustpilot
Marketing tools
Trustpilot Reviews
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional hosting provider with a broad service portfolio.
  2. Content is well structured with multi-language support.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Security policies and incident response contacts are not published.
  5. Use of Cloudflare DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  6. Multiple contact channels including phone, email, support tickets, and Telegram.
  7. Use of WordPress CMS with common plugins like Yoast SEO and Trustpilot Reviews.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using PHP and JavaScript libraries including jQuery. It leverages Cloudflare DNS services but does not enable DNSSEC, which is a missed opportunity for DNS security. Performance is moderate with use of caching and optimization plugins like Autoptimize. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format is implemented for rich snippets. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The technical stack is modern but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features to reduce technical debt and risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alexhost.md. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alexhost.md.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.