Skip to main content

Security report for alburn.co

Alburn Technologies · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alburn Technologies is a small technology studio specializing in applied artificial intelligence, product design, and research. The company positions itself as a niche provider targeting businesses and organizations seeking innovative AI-driven product solutions. The website is minimalistic but professional, emphasizing their core services and brand identity. Contact is facilitated through an external Airtable form, with no direct email or phone contacts provided on the site. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel, which supports fast performance and good mobile optimization. The site uses HTTPS and defers script loading for performance but lacks important security headers that could enhance protection. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and modern hosting but misses key security headers and lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for small tech firms, and no suspicious patterns were found. Overall, the website is safe and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance, enhanced security headers, and more transparent contact information to increase trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alburn.co

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Alburn Technologies operates in the technology sector focusing on applied AI and product design services. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting clients needing AI integration and product innovation. The company appears to be small in size with a focused market niche. The lack of detailed company information such as founding year or location limits deeper business intelligence. The use of an external Airtable form for contact suggests a lean operational model. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its specialization in AI and product research, but limited web presence and minimal content may restrict market reach.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the defense-in-depth level. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The lack of direct contact information for security incidents or abuse reporting suggests limited incident response readiness. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the site is secure for general use but requires enhancements to meet higher security and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide direct contact information such as a company email address and phone number for general and security incident communications.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and dependency checks to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website content and navigation to improve user experience and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alburn Technologies
Description
Applied AI, Product Design & Research Studio
Key services
Applied AI, Product Design, Research Studio
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Vercel Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Defer loading of scripts
  • Preloading fonts and styles

Analytics and tracking

Services
Vercel Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Vercel Analytics
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small technology studio focused on applied AI and product design.
  2. Content is minimal but professional with a clear business focus.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact is provided only via an external Airtable form link.
  5. No direct email or phone contact information is available on the site.
  6. Security headers are missing though HTTPS is enabled.
  7. Uses modern web technologies including Next.js and Vercel hosting.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected beyond minimal analytics.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. WHOIS data is privacy protected but consistent with a legitimate small business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack using Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel which provides fast loading times and good mobile responsiveness. The use of deferred script loading and font preloading indicates attention to performance optimization. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal, with no structured data or extensive metadata beyond basic Open Graph tags. The site lacks a CMS and appears to be a static or server-side rendered React application. No major technical debt or risks were identified, but improvements in SEO and accessibility could enhance digital maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alburn.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alburn.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.