Skip to main content

Security report for alarix.si

Alarix d.o.o. · Technology · Slovenia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alarix d.o.o. is a Slovenian ICT service provider specializing in integrating modern technologies into business environments. Established in 1999, the company offers a broad range of services including network infrastructure, server and peripheral maintenance, license compliance, and ICT security policy implementation. Their certified and experienced team operates throughout Slovenia, serving businesses seeking reliable ICT solutions. The website is built on WordPress and employs Google Analytics for visitor tracking, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is well-structured and mobile-optimized, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but the absence of security headers and formal security policies suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website reflects a professional small business with solid market positioning but could enhance trust and compliance by addressing privacy and security documentation gaps.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alarix.si

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Alarix d.o.o. holds a stable position in the Slovenian ICT market, leveraging long-term experience and certified partnerships with technology vendors like Veeam, HPE, Dell EMC, and VMware. Their business model focuses on service delivery and project financing for ICT infrastructure and optimization. The company targets business clients requiring comprehensive ICT integration and maintenance services. The presence of multiple partner logos indicates a strong ecosystem, enhancing credibility. However, the lack of visible contact details and privacy documentation on the website may limit lead generation and trust. Growth opportunities exist in expanding digital presence and formalizing compliance frameworks.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a presumably valid SSL certificate, which is a fundamental security measure. However, no HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The absence of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, posing legal risks. No forms or input fields were found on the homepage, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The use of Google Analytics with an opt-out mechanism is a positive privacy feature. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, policies, and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard HTTP security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security) to improve security posture.
  3. Include clear contact information such as company emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance trust and communication.
  4. Develop and display a security policy and incident response contact details to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit WordPress plugins and themes for vulnerabilities and keep the platform updated to reduce security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alarix d.o.o.
Description
Alarix d.o.o. provides comprehensive IT technology integration services, specializing in connecting modern technologies into business environments. They offer solutions ranging from simple networks to complex ICT infrastructure, including licensing compliance and ICT security policy verification. They have a certified and experienced team operating throughout Slovenia and experience in financing ICT projects and cost optimization.
Key services
ICT infrastructure integration, Computer and peripheral repair, Server and network equipment servicing, License compliance verification, ICT security policy implementation and verification, Remote assistance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.2.6, jQuery 3.6.4, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced with SSL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Google Analytics opt-out mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with standard plugins and Google Analytics
  5. Multiple technology partner logos displayed indicating industry relationships
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content
  7. No forms detected on the homepage for data collection
  8. No social media links found in the provided HTML content
  9. Website content is in Slovenian language
  10. Logo is clearly identified and used in header area
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.2.6 with jQuery 3.6.4 and uses the MonsterInsights plugin for Google Analytics integration. The site loads scripts asynchronously, which aids performance. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with a clear navigation structure. However, no advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries beyond jQuery were detected. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and structured data beyond basic canonical and RSS feed links. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and SEO through ARIA roles and enhanced metadata.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alarix.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alarix.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.