Skip to main content

Security report for akeneo.com

Akeneo · Technology · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Akeneo is a technology company specializing in Product Information Management (PIM) solutions designed to enhance product experience (PX) and product experience management (PXM) practices. Their platform aims to simplify product data management for businesses, increasing productivity and operational efficiency. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, SEO optimization, and extensive marketing and analytics integrations. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with multiple third-party tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Marketo, and Cookiebot, indicating a sophisticated marketing and data collection infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and a Content Security Policy in place, though additional security headers could improve defenses. Privacy compliance is supported by a cookie consent mechanism, but explicit privacy and terms of service pages were not detected in the provided content. WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which slightly reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professional and business-focused with no content safety concerns.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akeneo.com

This scan found 12 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
Average
81
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Akeneo operates in the enterprise software sector, targeting businesses that require robust product information management solutions. Their business model is SaaS-based, focusing on enabling PX and PXM strategies. The company appears well-positioned in the PIM market with a clear value proposition and a strong digital marketing ecosystem. The presence of multiple language versions and regional subdomains suggests a global or multi-regional market approach. The lack of visible contact information on the main page may indicate a lead generation model relying on forms or partner channels. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with marketing platforms to enhance customer acquisition and retention.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and a Content Security Policy. The use of Cookiebot for consent management aligns with GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options and Strict-Transport-Security represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The extensive use of third-party scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security posture.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS registration details to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Akeneo
Description
Akeneo PIM is an intuitive platform that simplifies product information management, enabling business to implement a PX strategy and PXM practices that increase productivity and efficiency.
Key services
Product Information Management platform, PX strategy enablement, PXM practices support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Marketo, StackAdapt, ZoomInfo Pixel, Cookiebot, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, StackAdapt
Tracking pixels
ZoomInfo Pixel, Hotjar, Cookiebot Pixel
Marketing tools
Marketo, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Professional and well-structured website with strong SEO and marketing integrations.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided HTML snippet.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not found in queried WHOIS server, which is unusual for a .com domain.
  6. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools integrated, indicating mature digital marketing strategy.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML content.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Marketo, and Cookiebot for marketing, analytics, and privacy compliance. The site uses a Content Security Policy to enforce HTTPS and upgrade insecure requests. Performance is moderate with multiple external scripts loaded asynchronously. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, supported by responsive design and font loading strategies. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO Premium plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for rich snippets. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable digital presence but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akeneo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akeneo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.