Skip to main content

Security report for akarion.app

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Akarion.app is a technology company offering a Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) cloud platform, as evidenced by the login page branding and title. The website is designed as a SaaS platform login portal targeting businesses and organizations requiring GRC solutions. The site uses modern frontend technologies including Vue.js and Tailwind CSS, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which limits its compliance posture. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and secure form inputs but lacks visible security headers and advanced protections such as anti-CSRF tokens. No contact or incident response information is provided, which may impact user trust and compliance readiness. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy disclosures to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akarion.app

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention akarion.app, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for akarion.app right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on SaaS delivery of GRC cloud services. Its market positioning appears specialized but not explicitly stated. The business model centers on subscription-based access to a cloud platform for governance, risk, and compliance management. The target customers are likely enterprises or organizations needing regulatory compliance tools. No public contact details or corporate information are provided, which limits transparency. The absence of marketing or advertising scripts suggests a focus on direct business clients rather than broad consumer marketing. The company uses privacy protection for domain registration, which is typical for technology firms. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate. The site enforces HTTPS and uses required form fields for login credentials, which is standard practice. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No visible anti-CSRF tokens or multi-factor authentication prompts are present. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency and preparedness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. Overall, while basic security measures are in place, there is room for improvement to meet higher security standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Include anti-CSRF tokens in login forms and consider multi-factor authentication to strengthen login security.
  4. Provide clear contact information and a security incident response policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Akarion appears to provide a Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) cloud platform, indicated by the login page branding and title.
Key services
Governance, Risk, and Compliance cloud platform
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, Falcon Icons (fal-icon), Tailwind CSS (tw- prefixed classes)
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URL scheme (https://akarion.app/login)
  • Secure form inputs with required attributes

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page for a GRC cloud platform named Akarion
  2. No public privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this page
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses visible
  4. Uses modern frontend technologies (Vue.js, Tailwind CSS, ES modules)
  5. No external third-party scripts or analytics detected
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts present
  7. No social media links or external marketing links found
  8. Form collects email and password with standard HTML5 validation
  9. No visible security headers or advanced security features in markup
  10. No explicit GDPR or data protection statements
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Vue.js components and Tailwind CSS for styling, leveraging ES modules for script loading. The site is mobile optimized and has a clean, professional design. However, no CMS or backend technologies are identifiable from the HTML content. Performance appears moderate with module preloading and minimal external dependencies. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating a privacy-conscious or minimalistic approach. The lack of security headers and privacy policies suggests technical debt in compliance and security best practices. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and SEO optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akarion.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akarion.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.