Skip to main content

Security report for akademiapuchatka.pl

GRUPA MASPEX Sp. z o.o. · Education · Poland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Akademia Bezpiecznego Puchatka is a well-established Polish educational program focused on child safety, targeting first-grade primary school students and preschool children. It is operated under the parent company GRUPA MASPEX Sp. z o.o., a reputable entity in Poland. The program offers free educational materials, certification, and testing to schools and preschools, supported by official patronages including the Polish Police and regional education authorities. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and highly relevant to its audience, with strong trust indicators such as testimonials and official endorsements. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and uses modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Owl Carousel. It is mobile-optimized and includes cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. While HTTPS is properly implemented, the site could improve its security posture by adding HTTP security headers and publishing a security policy or incident response contacts. Analytics are managed via Google Tag Manager, with moderate user tracking balanced by privacy compliance. Security-wise, the site shows good practices with secure forms and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of a security.txt file and explicit incident response information suggests room for maturity. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data align well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness. The risk profile is low, with no adult or questionable content detected. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen the website's security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akademiapuchatka.pl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The program holds a strong market position in Poland's educational sector, reaching over 3 million students historically and engaging thousands of teachers and schools annually. Its business model is a socially responsible educational initiative supported by Maspex, leveraging partnerships with police and educational authorities to enhance credibility and reach. The program's free materials and certification incentivize participation, fostering long-term engagement with schools and parents. The partnership ecosystem includes regional education curators and the Polish Police, enhancing trust and program legitimacy. Growth indicators include expansion to preschool materials and increasing participant numbers. The website supports this ecosystem with clear navigation, educational content, and contact channels, reinforcing the program's operational effectiveness and market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure contact forms requiring explicit user consent for data processing. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a moderate security gap. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of Google Tag Manager and cookie consent scripts indicates awareness of privacy and tracking compliance. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers and formalizing incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards, improving usability for all users.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced and maintain up-to-date versions.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GRUPA MASPEX Sp. z o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GRUPA MASPEX Sp. z o.o.
Description
Ogólnopolski program edukacyjny skierowany do uczniów klas I szkół podstawowych oraz przedszkoli, uczący zasad bezpieczeństwa w różnych sferach życia dzieci.
Key services
Edukacja o bezpieczeństwie dzieci, Materiały edukacyjne dla szkół i przedszkoli, Certyfikacja placówek, Ogólnopolski Test Bezpieczeństwa
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, iCheck
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure contact form with required consent checkbox

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieLaw.org consent script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and highly relevant to the educational sector.
  3. Strong trust signals from official patronages and certifications.
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance with explicit consent mechanisms.
  5. No direct email addresses found; contact via form and phone only.
  6. Security headers not explicitly detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and WordPress CMS.
  8. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, and iCheck for UI components and interactivity. The site loads asynchronously loaded scripts for cookie consent and Google Tag Manager, indicating a modern approach to analytics and compliance. Performance is moderate with responsive images and mobile optimization present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. However, no advanced frameworks or platforms beyond WordPress and common JS libraries are detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and improved accessibility compliance to reduce technical risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akademiapuchatka.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akademiapuchatka.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.