Skip to main content

Security report for ait.com

Advanced Internet Technologies · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Advanced Internet Technologies (AIT) is a mature and established technology company specializing in domain registration, web hosting, digital marketing, web design, security, and e-commerce solutions. With a domain age of 27 years and strong domain protection, AIT positions itself as a reliable service provider targeting businesses seeking comprehensive online presence solutions. The website reflects a professional design with clear navigation and a focus on customer support, including 24/7 availability and multiple contact channels. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and integrates modern libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap. It leverages Cloudflare for hosting and CDN services, and employs SEO and marketing tools like Yoast SEO Premium and WP Rocket. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security gap, and does not implement cookie consent mechanisms, impacting privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate with several security headers configured, but the absence of HTTPS and TLS protocols significantly reduces the security score. No major vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, but improvements are needed to meet modern security standards. Business credibility is high, supported by consistent WHOIS data, customer testimonials, and active social media presence. Overall, while AIT demonstrates strong business credibility and technical maturity, urgent attention to SSL/TLS implementation and privacy compliance is recommended to enhance security and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ait.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AIT operates in the technology sector, focusing on internet infrastructure and digital services. Its business model revolves around providing domain registration, hosting, and digital marketing services to small and medium businesses. The company benefits from a mature domain and strong brand consistency. Revenue streams likely include domain sales, hosting subscriptions, and marketing service packages. The target customers are businesses seeking reliable online presence and e-commerce capabilities. Partnerships with lead generation platforms and integration with major social media and analytics services indicate a strategic approach to market reach and customer acquisition. The company maintains a U.S.-based office and datacenter presence, reinforcing trust and compliance with local regulations.

Security posture

The security maturity of AIT is moderate but currently compromised by the lack of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS enforcement. While several security headers are implemented, the absence of TLS protocols and HSTS reduces protection against common web threats. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found. The site uses modern security practices like Content Security Policy and XSS protection headers. However, the lack of cookie consent and explicit incident response contacts suggests gaps in compliance and readiness. The company should prioritize SSL deployment, enhance privacy mechanisms, and formalize incident response channels to improve security posture and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide immediately.
  2. Enable and configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and ensure all third-party scripts are secure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Advanced Internet Technologies, Inc.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme and integrates popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap. It employs caching and performance optimization via WP Rocket and uses Cloudflare as a CDN and server provider. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO Premium. The site is mobile responsive and has good navigation clarity. However, performance metrics are not available, and the lack of HTTPS is a significant technical risk. The site uses lazy loading for images and preconnects to multiple external domains for performance. Technical debt appears low, but SSL absence and missing privacy mechanisms are critical modernization needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ait.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ait.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.