Skip to main content

Security report for ais.sk

A.I.S. s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

A.I.S. s.r.o. is a Slovakian IT service provider established in 1999, specializing in computer network management, server administration, computer servicing, electronic security, and web development. The company targets businesses and organizations in need of comprehensive IT infrastructure and web solutions. Their website reflects a broad portfolio of services including hardware supply, VPN, firewall protection, and SGI hardware representation. Technically, the website uses standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Analytics for tracking and a simple image gallery script. The site is accessible and moderately optimized but lacks advanced mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no security headers or incident response contacts are published. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent banner present but no privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website is professional but could improve in compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ais.sk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a stable market position as a local IT service provider with a long operational history since 1999. Their business model focuses on service delivery across IT infrastructure management, hardware solutions, and web services. The target customers are primarily businesses requiring IT support and web presence. The company leverages partnerships such as slovensko.digital and represents SGI hardware in the region. Revenue streams likely come from service contracts, hardware sales, and web hosting. The website content and structure indicate a focus on reliability and breadth of services rather than aggressive marketing or e-commerce. Growth indicators are moderate with a consistent service offering and established client zone. The partnership ecosystem is limited but includes recognized local digital initiatives.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, indicating some GDPR awareness. However, the absence of a privacy policy, terms of service, security headers, and incident response contacts reveals compliance and security gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content, but the lack of security best practices such as security.txt and explicit incident response channels reduces readiness. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security culture appears basic with room for improvement in transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add clear incident response and abuse contact information, including a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  4. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Develop and publish terms of service and a vulnerability disclosure policy to formalize user agreements and security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
A.I.S. s.r.o.
Description
Správa počítačových sietí, servis a údržba počítačov, elektronické zabezpečenie, tvorba webových stránok, web portály, domény, servery, SGI hardware and solutions.
Key services
Správa počítačových sietí, Správa serverov, Servis a údržba počítačov, Dodávky hardvéru a riešení, Realizácia dátových vedení, Prevádzka / zálohovanie, Čistenie počítačov, VoIP telefóny a ústredne, Prístupové systémy a vrátniky, Firewall ochrana
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Dynamic Drive SimpleGallery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by base href https://)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented, indicating some GDPR awareness.
  4. Contact information limited to phone number; no email or physical address found in HTML.
  5. No security.txt or incident response contacts published.
  6. Use of Google Analytics for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
  7. Website content is business and technology focused, safe for general audiences.
  8. Technical implementation is basic with room for improvement in mobile optimization and accessibility.
  9. No visible security headers detected in provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript technologies, including Google Analytics for tracking and a third-party image gallery script. The site uses HTTPS as indicated by the base URL but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, suggesting potential technical debt and modernization opportunities. The absence of security headers and incident response mechanisms represents technical risks that could impact business operations if exploited. Overall, the infrastructure is functional but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ais.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ais.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.