Skip to main content

Security report for airreviews.io

Air Reviews · Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Air Reviews is a technology startup founded in 2023, offering a SaaS platform focused on helping e-commerce businesses, particularly Shopify merchants, leverage customer reviews to improve learning and conversion rates. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and integrates with Shopify via an app link. The technical infrastructure is modern but basic, with Cloudflare DNS and HTTPS enabled, though lacking DNSSEC and security headers. The security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and security best practices. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which impacts compliance and trust. Overall, the business appears legitimate but early-stage, with a need to enhance privacy compliance and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching airreviews.io

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets the e-commerce sector, focusing on review management as a key service. Its business model is SaaS delivered via Shopify app marketplace, positioning it as a niche player in the competitive e-commerce tools market. The lack of detailed business information and contact emails suggests a small or early-stage company. The partnership with Shopify is a critical channel for customer acquisition. Growth potential depends on expanding trust signals and compliance maturity.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are important for preventing common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. Absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap under GDPR and other regulations. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities detected in the provided content. Security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet industry best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Add incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to build trust.
  5. Improve SEO by adjusting meta robots tags and adding sitemap and structured data.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Air Reviews
Description
Air Reviews provides a platform focused on leveraging customer reviews to help businesses learn from and convert with reviews. It targets e-commerce businesses, particularly Shopify users, to enhance their customer engagement and sales through review management.
Key services
Review collection, Review analysis, Conversion optimization with reviews
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor 3.29.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Shopify app marketplace
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Elementor builder.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found or linked in main navigation.
  3. Contact information only via contact form; no emails or phone numbers found.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  5. HTTPS is enabled and domain status clientTransferProhibited is set.
  6. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  7. External links primarily to Shopify app store and plugin resources.
  8. No social media links detected in provided content.
  9. Meta robots tag set to noindex, nofollow, which may limit SEO visibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with Elementor 3.29.2, using jQuery and several Elementor-related CSS and JS libraries. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity but limited SEO optimization due to noindex meta tag. Performance is moderate with potential for improvement by optimizing assets and enabling caching. Accessibility is basic, with no explicit ARIA or accessibility features detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and SEO improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with airreviews.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review airreviews.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.