Skip to main content

Security report for aira.cz

Aira GROUP, s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aira GROUP, s.r.o. is a Czech-based technology and media service provider specializing in IT outsourcing, web development, online marketing, and application development. The company targets businesses seeking comprehensive digital solutions and has a strong market presence supported by notable client references. Their website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with modern technologies such as jQuery, bxSlider, and integration of analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and professional content. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data suggests privacy protection, which is common for businesses but slightly reduces transparency. Overall, the website and business appear legitimate and professionally managed.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of aira.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aira.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
78
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology and media sectors, offering essential services including IT outsourcing, web and app development, and online marketing. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering tailored digital solutions to a medium-sized client base. The presence of multiple high-profile clients and a comprehensive portfolio indicates a competitive market position. The company maintains active social media channels and a blog, supporting customer engagement and thought leadership. GDPR compliance and transparent contact information enhance trustworthiness. The company appears to have steady growth potential and a solid partnership ecosystem, though no explicit parent or subsidiary relationships are identified.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements, reflecting a good baseline security posture. Use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts is managed with user consent, reducing privacy risks. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could impact preparedness for security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be enhanced with additional technical controls and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider publishing vulnerability disclosure and responsible disclosure policies to foster trust and security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Aira GROUP, s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ 25682598
Registration number
25682598
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aira GROUP, s.r.o.
Description
Pomáhá s tvorbou webů, online marketingem, outsourcingem IT a vývojem aplikací. Poskytuje kompletní správu počítačových sítí, tvorbu webových stránek a aplikací, a online marketingové služby.
Key services
Outsourcing IT, Web development, Online marketing, Application development, Server rental and management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, bxSlider, FancyBox, Font Awesome, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Leady tracking, Drupal CMS (implied by references)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure analytics and marketing scripts with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Seznam Retargeting
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Leady
Marketing tools
Leady
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with detailed consent mechanisms.
  4. Professional business website with clear contact and company information.
  5. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools with user consent.
  6. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. References and client logos indicate established market presence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including jQuery, bxSlider for sliders, FancyBox for modals, and Font Awesome for icons. Integration with Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and Leady tracking indicates a mature marketing and analytics setup. The site is likely built on Drupal CMS as inferred from references in client projects. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring encrypted communications. There is no explicit hosting provider information detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aira.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aira.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.