Skip to main content

Security report for ain.se

Oderland · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ain.se currently serves as a default server landing page for a hosting server under the Oderland brand, a Swedish web hosting provider. The page content is minimal, primarily providing links to cPanel and webmail login portals and a link to the main Oderland homepage. There is no substantive business content, privacy policies, or contact information presented on this page, indicating it is not a fully developed customer-facing website but rather a placeholder or default server page. From a technical perspective, the site uses basic HTML and CSS without any advanced frameworks or CMS detected. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, which is a significant security concern. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No analytics or tracking technologies are present, suggesting minimal digital maturity. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and any visible security best practices. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing attack surface but also indicating limited functionality. The site does not provide any incident response or security contact information, which is a gap for operational security. Overall, the site is low risk due to its minimal content but also low trust and professionalism. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, improving security headers, and developing a full business website with clear contact and compliance information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ain.se

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
32

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ain.se, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ain.se.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain ain.se appears to be associated with Oderland, a Swedish web hosting provider. The business model focuses on providing web hosting services, including cPanel and webmail access. The target market is Swedish customers seeking reliable hosting solutions. The company positions itself as a leading web hosting provider in Sweden. However, the analyzed page is a default server landing page rather than a full business site, limiting insights into revenue streams or partnerships. There is no visible evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies. The lack of contact information and policies on this page suggests this domain may be used primarily for server management or internal purposes rather than direct customer engagement.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. The absence of HTTPS means data transmitted is not encrypted, exposing users to interception risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are present to mitigate common web attacks. There are no visible forms or inputs, reducing attack vectors but also limiting functionality. No privacy or cookie policies are provided, indicating non-compliance with GDPR. The lack of incident response contacts or security policies further reduces the site's security maturity. Overall, the site does not follow modern security best practices and should be improved to protect users and comply with regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Include contact information and a security incident response policy to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Develop a full business website with clear navigation, content, and compliance documentation.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oderland
Description
Oderland is a Swedish web hosting service provider, claiming to be Sweden's best web hotel (webbhotell). The page is a default server landing page for a server named premium28.oderland.com, indicating hosting services.
Key services
Web hosting, cPanel access, Webmail services
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. The website is a default server landing page, not a full business site.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms present.
  4. No scripts or analytics detected.
  5. No social media or email contacts found.
  6. The page uses basic HTML and CSS with inline styles.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible from provided data.
  8. External links point only to related Oderland domains.
  9. No evidence of advertising or tracking technologies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML5 and CSS3 without any detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. The hosting provider is inferred to be Oderland based on domain references. The page is a default server landing page with minimal content and no dynamic elements. Performance is likely moderate due to simplicity but lacks optimization for mobile and accessibility. SEO is poor due to minimal meta tags and no structured data. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts. The technical implementation is basic and requires modernization to meet current web standards and security requirements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ain.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ain.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.