Skip to main content

Security report for aiko.ee

G4S · Technology · Estonia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website aiko.ee represents a wireless home security service branded as AIKO, supported by the established security company G4S. It offers a modern, wireless home alarm system with a mobile app for remote control and monitoring. The business targets residential customers in Estonia seeking reliable home security solutions with professional installation and a security guarantee. The site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates consent management via Cookiebot, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot scripts, hosted by Telia Eesti AS, ensuring stable infrastructure and performance. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is supported by a cookie consent mechanism but lacks a clearly accessible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aiko.ee

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AIKO operates in the home security sector with a focus on wireless alarm systems integrated with mobile applications. The business model combines hardware sales, installation services, and monthly subscription fees for monitoring and security guarantees. The partnership with G4S strengthens market position and trust. The target market is Estonian homeowners and apartment dwellers who value convenience and professional security services. The website content and forms indicate active lead generation and customer engagement strategies. The use of Cookiebot and Google Tag Manager shows attention to privacy and marketing analytics. The company appears medium-sized with a recent domain registration consistent with product launch timelines.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and no visible sensitive data leaks. Cookie consent is properly managed, and no vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No published security policy or incident response contacts were found, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The site does not show signs of malware or phishing. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and additional header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security policy page and incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
G4S
Description
AIKO nutikas juhtmevaba koduvalve kaitseb kodu ning turvatunnet, pakkudes juhtmevaba valve lahendust koos G4S patrullidega. Pakutakse turvagarantiid ja nutikat rakendust koduvalve juhtimiseks.
Key services
Juhtmevaba koduvalve süsteem, Turvagarantii, Paigaldus ja seadistamine, AIKO mobiilirakendus
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Animate.css, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  3. Multiple contact forms collect personal data including name, phone, email, and location.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. Website uses HTTPS and modern frontend technologies.
  6. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot scripts are used for analytics and consent management.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Business is linked to G4S, a known security company, enhancing trust.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Animate.css for animations, and Google Fonts for typography. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are integrated for analytics and consent management, indicating a mature approach to user tracking and privacy. Hosting is provided by Telia Eesti AS, a reputable Estonian provider. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and user experience. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or static site architecture. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement additional security headers to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aiko.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aiko.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.