Skip to main content

Security report for aiinformatics.com

applied international informatics GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Applied international informatics GmbH is a German IT service provider specializing in SAP consulting, digital transformation, and managed cloud services targeted primarily at the Mittelstand (small and medium-sized enterprises) in Germany. The company positions itself as a trusted partner offering comprehensive IT solutions including licensing, maintenance, and cloud hosting. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear contact information and social media engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like React and includes SEO optimizations and cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, the website suffers from a critical security deficiency due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, exposing users to potential risks. Performance is also suboptimal with a slow page load time. Security best practices such as HTTP security headers and modern TLS protocols are missing, which lowers the overall security posture. Despite these issues, the business credibility remains high given the clear certifications and trust signals. Strategic improvements in security infrastructure and performance optimization are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aiinformatics.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on manufacturing and SAP-related services. Their business model revolves around providing end-to-end IT solutions for digital transformation and cloud services to German SMEs. They maintain partnerships such as with Atos for whistleblower systems and hold SAP Platinum Partner status, indicating strong industry ties. The website content and navigation are well-structured, targeting decision-makers in medium-sized enterprises seeking reliable IT partners. Marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Borlabs Cookie are used for user tracking and consent management, reflecting a moderate digital maturity. The absence of explicit security policies or incident response information suggests an area for growth in corporate governance and transparency.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS and valid SSL certificates, no HTTP security headers, and no modern TLS protocols enabled. While Captcha.eu is used to protect forms and cookie consent is implemented, the absence of fundamental transport layer security exposes the site and its users to significant risks such as data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The site does not implement HSTS or OCSP stapling, further weakening its defense. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and implementation of security headers are critical to improve the security stance.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Activate HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS usage.
  5. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  6. Publish clear security and incident response policies to enhance transparency and trust.
  7. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience.
  8. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with integration of React for interactive components. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, and cookie consent is handled by Borlabs Cookie, ensuring GDPR compliance. The site uses jQuery and includes Captcha.eu for form protection. Despite a modern tech stack, the site suffers from slow load times (over 16 seconds) and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical technical flaw. No hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Accessibility features are basic, and mobile optimization is good. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires urgent security and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aiinformatics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aiinformatics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.