AI House Davos is a non-commercial, independent initiative founded in 2023 by the ETH AI Center and Merantix, based in Davos, Switzerland. It serves as a multi-stakeholder platform to foster dialogue and collaboration among AI researchers, industry leaders, policymakers, and investors. The organization hosts an annual event coinciding with the World Economic Forum, focusing on sustainable and secure AI development. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence, leveraging modern web technologies and compliance tools such as Cookiebot for privacy management. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain legitimacy, though the association with reputable organizations mitigates concerns. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and consent mechanisms, but could be enhanced with explicit security headers and published security policies.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
78
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention aihousedavos.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for aihousedavos.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The AI House targets a niche audience of AI professionals and policymakers, positioning itself as a thought leader and convening platform in the AI ecosystem. Its business model is non-profit and collaboration-driven, relying on partnerships with academic and industry leaders. The presence of Turing Award winners and a guest country (Poland) at events indicates strong networking and influence. The organization’s digital footprint is consistent and professional, supporting its credibility and outreach efforts. Growth potential lies in expanding event participation and deepening partnerships.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent management, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected, and no dedicated security or incident response pages are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could be strengthened to align with best practices for organizations handling sensitive AI discussions.
Recommendations
Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Consider adding phone contact information for enhanced trust and accessibility.
Verify and publish domain registration details to improve legitimacy and trust signals.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
AI House Association
Description
AI House is an independent, non-commercial initiative established in 2023 by the ETH AI Center and Merantix in Davos, Switzerland. It serves as a multi-stakeholder platform bringing together senior researchers, executives, entrepreneurs, investors, and policymakers to address pressing AI questions. The mission is to drive secure and sustainable AI solutions by bridging research, industry, policymaking, and societal needs. The community convenes annually during the World Economic Forum in Davos.
Key services
Annual AI House Davos event, Platform for AI dialogue and collaboration, Connecting regional and international organizations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Droid Sans), Cookiebot (consent management), Google Tag Manager, YouTube embeds, jQuery 3.5.1
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Cookie consent implemented
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trust.
Strong branding and professional presentation.
Good privacy and cookie compliance with Cookiebot integration.
No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
No phone numbers found; only email and physical address contacts.
Social media presence on LinkedIn and YouTube confirmed.
No forms detected on homepage; contact likely via dedicated contact page.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies including Google Fonts, jQuery, and Cookiebot for consent management. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and YouTube embeds for multimedia content. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates fast loading times. The technical implementation is robust with no visible errors or broken elements. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and add structured security documentation. The current infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence suitable for the organization's goals.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with aihousedavos.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aihousedavos.com.