Skip to main content

Security report for aigof.com

中国卫生资格考试网 · Education · China

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

中国卫生资格考试网 is a specialized online portal providing comprehensive information and services related to healthcare qualification exams in China. The website offers exam registration details, schedules, conditions, admission ticket printing, score inquiries, and study materials primarily targeting healthcare professionals preparing for national qualification exams. The business operates as an information service platform within the education sector, focusing on healthcare certification. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, with a moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. The domain is newly registered in 2024, consistent with the site's focus on upcoming 2025 exams. Security posture is moderate with some gaps such as lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers, and no visible HTTPS confirmation in the provided data. Privacy compliance is limited, with no cookie consent mechanism and only basic privacy and terms pages available. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aigof.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a niche educational resource for healthcare professionals in China, providing timely and region-specific exam information. Its competitive advantage lies in detailed, frequently updated content and localized city subdomains. The business model appears to be content-driven, possibly monetized through partnerships or advertising, though no direct e-commerce or payment processing is evident. The target audience includes healthcare exam candidates and related stakeholders. The partnership ecosystem includes several related educational and regional websites linked as friendly sites. Growth indicators include recent domain registration and active content updates. Strategic observations suggest the need for improved security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The domain uses clientTransferProhibited status to prevent unauthorized transfers, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for DNS security. No HTTP security headers were detected, and there is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement in the provided data, which is a critical gap. No incident response or security policy information is available, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The absence of cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms suggests potential regulatory risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the site requires improvements in TLS configuration, security headers, and privacy compliance to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and enforce HTTPS with a strong TLS configuration to secure all communications.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  3. Add standard HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
中国卫生资格考试网
Description
中国卫生资格考试网提供全国卫生资格考试报名、卫生专业技术资格考试报名条件、卫生专业技术资格考试登记表、卫生资格考试准考证打印、卫生资格考试成绩查询服务。
Key services
卫生资格考试报名信息, 考试时间及条件, 准考证打印, 成绩查询, 考试大纲及备考资料
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu linksubmit push.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a specialized portal for Chinese healthcare qualification exams.
  2. Content is primarily in Chinese and well-structured with frequent updates.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is limited but present with email and phone number.
  5. No advanced security headers or policies found.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. Website uses Bootstrap and jQuery for frontend.
  8. External links mostly to related educational or regional sites.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap and jQuery, indicating a traditional responsive front-end framework. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for viewport and keywords, supporting SEO. Performance is moderate, with external scripts loaded from reliable CDNs. Mobile optimization is basic but present. No CMS or advanced backend technologies were detected from the HTML. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar information. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack by adopting newer frameworks and improving accessibility features. The lack of structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) limits rich search engine results and social media integration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aigof.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aigof.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.