Skip to main content

Security report for aiasociace.legal

Advokátní asociace pro AI, z.s. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Advokátní asociace pro AI, z.s. is a Czech non-profit association dedicated to promoting responsible and ethical use of artificial intelligence in the legal profession. The organization supports developers, investors, and legal professionals by providing guidance on AI tools, protecting client rights, and upholding traditional legal values in the context of emerging technologies. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear mission statements and recent news updates, positioning the association as a niche leader in AI and legal tech within the Czech Republic. Technically, the website is built on the solidpixels CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, and Google Fonts. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. However, there is a lack of visible security headers and no explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement in compliance and security posture. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and incomplete WHOIS data reduce overall trust and compliance scores. The WHOIS data is malformed and lacks registrar and registrant details, which limits domain trust verification but the website content and contact information suggest a legitimate entity. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and relevant to its target audience but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security headers, and transparent domain registration information to improve trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aiasociace.legal

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aiasociace.legal, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aiasociace.legal right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association operates as a small non-profit entity focused on the intersection of AI and legal services in the Czech Republic. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on ethical AI use in law, serving a targeted audience of legal professionals, developers, and the public interested in legal technology. The business model centers on advocacy, education, and community building rather than commercial revenue streams. Partnership with solidpixels for website infrastructure and presence on social media platforms like Facebook and LinkedIn support its outreach efforts. Growth indicators include recent news updates and active engagement in AI compliance and legal tech discussions. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved transparency in domain registration and enhanced privacy compliance to strengthen credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled, ensuring secure data transmission. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth strategies. No forms or input fields were detected that might expose vulnerabilities, and no sensitive data leakage was observed. Compliance gaps include missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical under GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for informational purposes but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and establish an incident response contact channel to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Improve WHOIS domain registration transparency or provide justification for privacy protection to enhance trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update website technologies and content to maintain performance, security, and compliance standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Advokátní asociace pro AI, z.s.
Registration number
218 61 170
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Advokátní asociace pro AI, z.s.
Description
AI pro efektivnější advokacii. Advokátní asociace pro AI vznikla pro to, aby se při použití nových technologií dodržovaly advokátní a etické principy správným způsobem.
Key services
Support for developers and investors, Protection of client rights, Promotion of legal ethical values in AI
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Solidpixels CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on AI in legal profession with clear mission and values.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email and physical address.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and a CMS platform (solidpixels).
  7. No forms detected on the homepage or main content.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn is linked.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is used.
  10. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the solidpixels CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript frameworks and Google services such as Google Tag Manager and Google Fonts. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO metadata and structured navigation. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and images. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates areas for modernization. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence suitable for the association's goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aiasociace.legal. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aiasociace.legal.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.