Skip to main content

Security report for agromonitoring.com

AgroMonitoring · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AgroMonitoring is a UK-based technology company specializing in providing satellite imagery, vegetation indices, and weather data tailored for precision farming and crop monitoring. Their offerings include an API, dashboard, crop map, and customizable analytics reports, targeting agricultural businesses and developers. The company has been operational since 2014 and maintains a professional web presence with consistent branding and clear service descriptions. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Chart.js, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improvement. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-structured, and serves its niche market effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agromonitoring.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AgroMonitoring occupies a niche market in agricultural technology, leveraging satellite and weather data to provide precision farming tools. Their business model is subscription and API-based, appealing to agronomists, farmers, and developers needing reliable data feeds. The company demonstrates stable market positioning with a mature domain and transparent registration. Partnerships with openagro.uk and openweathermap.org suggest a collaborative ecosystem enhancing their data and analytics capabilities. The absence of phone contact and limited social media presence indicates a focus on digital and API-driven customer engagement. The company’s growth potential lies in expanding analytics services and enhancing data customization for clients.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, indicating basic security hygiene. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could impact trust from security-conscious clients. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but no cookie consent mechanism is present, which may raise privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in DNS security, header implementation, and privacy transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve incident response readiness and build trust.
  5. Consider adding phone contact information and social media links to improve business credibility and customer engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AgroMonitoring
Description
Based on a large amount of processing satellite and climate data, AgroMonitoring provides satellite imagery, vegetation indices, weather data, analytical reports, and crop monitoring services.
Key services
Agro API with satellite imagery and weather data, Agro Dashboard for field monitoring, Crop Map with recognized field boundaries and crop types, Customizable Agro Analytics reports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Popper.js, Bootstrap, Chart.js, Moment.js, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4, Black Design System
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on satellite and weather data services for agriculture.
  3. No forms detected that collect personal data on the landing page.
  4. Contact email uses a domain related to OpenWeatherMap, indicating possible partnership or shared infrastructure.
  5. No phone numbers found on the site.
  6. No social media links explicitly present in the HTML content.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks.
  8. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  9. Terms and Privacy policies are present but basic in nature.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 4, jQuery, Chart.js, and Moment.js, providing a responsive and interactive user experience. Hosting on AWS DNS infrastructure suggests reliable uptime and scalability. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the site lacks a known CMS, indicating a custom or bespoke solution which may require dedicated maintenance. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced to meet higher standards. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could benefit from improved security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agromonitoring.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agromonitoring.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.