Skip to main content

Security report for agrello.io

Agrello · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agrello is a technology company specializing in secure e-signature and contract management solutions tailored primarily for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The platform offers a comprehensive suite of services including document automation, bulk contract creation, and legally binding electronic signatures compliant with EU and UK regulations. Positioned as a time-saving and efficient alternative to manual contract workflows, Agrello emphasizes ease of use, security, and compliance. The company operates from Estonia and provides multilingual support, reflecting a focus on European markets. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager. The platform supports integrations via Zapier and offers API access, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, with clear navigation and professional design. From a security perspective, Agrello enforces HTTPS, uses reCAPTCHA for form protection, and implements cookie consent mechanisms. While explicit security headers are not fully documented in the HTML, the overall posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for SaaS providers, and the domain appears actively maintained. Overall, Agrello presents a trustworthy, professional, and technically sound online presence suitable for its target market. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency around security policies and incident response, and publishing vulnerability disclosure information to further build trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agrello.io

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Agrello occupies a niche in the legal technology sector, focusing on contract lifecycle management and e-signatures for SMEs. Its competitive advantage lies in automation features such as bulk contract creation from Excel and Word templates, integration capabilities, and compliance with eIDAS standards. The subscription-based SaaS model with tiered pricing and free trials supports scalable customer acquisition. The company leverages content marketing through blogs and case studies to educate and attract users. Partnerships and integrations with platforms like Zapier expand its ecosystem. The business targets companies with high contract volumes seeking to reduce manual effort and improve legal certainty. Growth indicators include recent blog activity and continuous platform updates. No parent or subsidiary relationships are evident from the data.

Security posture

Agrello demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse, and cookie consent compliance aligned with GDPR. The platform's e-signature solution is eIDAS compliant, providing legal enforceability and audit trails. No direct security policies or incident response contacts are published, which is a gap in transparency. No vulnerabilities or insecure libraries were detected in the website code. Security headers are likely managed by the hosting platform but should be explicitly verified. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page limits external reporting channels. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by publishing formal security documentation and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security controls and compliance certifications.
  2. Add incident response contact information and consider implementing a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosures.
  3. Explicitly configure and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Enhance transparency around data retention and privacy practices to strengthen GDPR compliance signals.
  5. Continue to monitor and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Agrello
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agrello
Description
Create, sign & manage legally-binding agreements with Agrello's secure e-signature platform. Try our free plan or schedule a demo for advanced document workflow automation.
Key services
E-signature platform, Contract management, Document automation, Bulk contract creation and signing, Integration via Zapier and API
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Lato, Inter, Manrope), Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Word template integration, Zapier integration, Google reCAPTCHA, JavaScript libraries (jQuery 3.5.1), CookieYes for cookie consent, Microsoft Clarity analytics
Frameworks
Webflow, Google Optimize
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Optimize
Marketing tools
Google Optimize, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Strong focus on e-signature and contract management for SMEs
  3. Multiple language support (English, Estonian, Latvian, Ukrainian)
  4. Comprehensive pricing and feature descriptions
  5. Active blog with recent posts dated 2025
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics
  7. Good privacy and cookie compliance mechanisms
  8. No direct email addresses found in HTML; contact via forms and phone
  9. WHOIS data is privacy protected with no public registrant info
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Google Fonts for typography. It integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Optimize, and Microsoft Clarity, enabling robust user behavior tracking and A/B testing. The site is optimized for fast loading and mobile responsiveness, with structured data (JSON-LD) implemented for SEO and rich snippets. Hosting appears to be on a cloud platform associated with Webflow, ensuring scalability and reliability. The use of reCAPTCHA protects forms from spam and abuse. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern, well-maintained, and aligned with best practices for SaaS platforms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agrello.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agrello.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.