Skip to main content

Security report for agorify.com

Agorify AB · Technology · Sweden

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agorify AB operates a comprehensive event management platform designed to empower event organizers, sponsors, exhibitors, and attendees with a suite of tools including onsite badge printing, ticketing, lead retrieval, and a mobile event app. The company positions itself as a reliable and innovative player in the event technology sector, serving a global customer base with over 1500 event organizers and a strong emphasis on user experience and engagement. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Hubspot, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, the security posture is notably weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS, which poses significant risks to user data and trust. Privacy compliance is well addressed through the use of Cookiebot and a comprehensive GDPR-compliant privacy policy. Overall, while the business and technical maturity are strong, immediate remediation of security deficiencies is critical to maintain trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of agorify.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agorify.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Agorify's market positioning as a SaaS event management platform with free and paid plans targets event professionals seeking streamlined event execution and attendee engagement. The platform's competitive advantages include a broad feature set, integration with popular marketing and analytics tools, and a user-friendly interface supported by positive customer testimonials. Revenue streams likely derive from subscription plans and value-added services. The company maintains an active partnership ecosystem with Hubspot and Cookiebot, enhancing marketing and compliance capabilities. Strategic observations highlight the company's focus on digital transformation in event management and its commitment to privacy and user consent. Growth indicators include a sizable user base and global reach, though the lack of explicit terms of service and security policies may be areas for future development.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to critical issues such as the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, resulting in no HTTPS support. This exposes the website and its users to potential data interception and undermines trust. While SPF and DMARC records are configured to protect email integrity, the lack of HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption further weaken the security posture. Compliance with GDPR is supported by a detailed privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, but incident response readiness and security policy documentation are missing. The security culture appears to prioritize privacy compliance but lacks robust technical security controls. Immediate actions are required to secure communications and protect user data effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking and reduce latency.
  5. Develop and publish clear security policies and incident response procedures accessible to users.
  6. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack using Next.js and React, hosted on Google Cloud infrastructure. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Hubspot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, with a professional design and clear navigation. However, performance is slow with a load time of over 7 seconds and a large page size (~387 KB). There is no CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. Technical risks include the lack of HTTPS and TLS support, which could impact user trust and search engine rankings. Opportunities exist to optimize performance and enhance security configurations to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agorify.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agorify.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.