Skip to main content

Security report for agorapulse.com

Agorapulse · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

92/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agorapulse is a leading social media management SaaS platform designed to help businesses, agencies, and marketers streamline their social media workflows. The platform offers a comprehensive suite of tools including inbox management, publishing, listening, reporting, and social ROI measurement. Positioned as an industry leader, Agorapulse boasts strong customer support and is trusted by over 31,000 social media managers worldwide. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive integrations with major social networks and marketing tools. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack with analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Segment, Heap Analytics, and CookieYes for consent management. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, ensuring a positive user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and bot management via Cloudflare, although explicit security headers and policies could be more transparent. From a security and compliance perspective, the site includes a comprehensive privacy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance indicators and a consent mechanism. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contacts were found, and WHOIS data is unavailable likely due to privacy protection, which is common for SaaS businesses. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, Agorapulse presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header transparency, publishing a security policy, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agorapulse.com

This scan found 9 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
85
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
92

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Agorapulse operates in the competitive social media management market, targeting businesses of all sizes, digital marketers, and agencies. Its competitive advantages include a user-friendly interface, comprehensive feature set, and industry-leading customer support. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, generating revenue through tiered plans including a free tier. The company has established partnerships with major platforms like TikTok, AWS, Meta, and LinkedIn, enhancing its ecosystem and integration capabilities. Growth indicators include a large user base and multiple industry awards. The company emphasizes actionable insights and ROI measurement, differentiating itself from competitors. Strategic observations suggest continued investment in AI features and team collaboration tools to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of bot management cookies from Cloudflare. Cookie consent is managed via CookieYes, indicating GDPR compliance efforts. However, explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options were not explicitly found in the HTML content, suggesting room for improvement. No security policy or incident response contact information is published, which could hinder vulnerability reporting and incident handling. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is typical for SaaS companies but limits transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing clearer data retention and processing policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agorapulse
Description
An easy to use Social Media Management Software that allows you to stay organized, save time, and easily manage your inbox, publishing, reporting, monitoring, and team collaboration tools.
Key services
Social media inbox management, Publishing and scheduling, Social media listening and monitoring, Reporting and analytics, Social ROI measurement, Team collaboration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Segment Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, Heap Analytics, HubSpot, Intercom, Cloudflare, Wistia video embed, CookieYes consent management
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), jQuery (implied by scripts), CookieYes Consent Framework
Platforms
Web, Mobile (responsive design)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • Use of bot management cookies (Cloudflare)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Heap Analytics, FullStory, Segment Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, BugSnag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Heap Analytics, FullStory, BugSnag
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, Intercom, CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  3. No direct company emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact primarily via forms and social media.
  4. Strong use of third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy protection.
  7. Website content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and robust technical infrastructure with multiple analytics and marketing integrations including Google Tag Manager, Segment, Heap Analytics, and Visual Website Optimizer. The front-end appears to use Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, supporting responsive and accessible design. Performance optimizations such as lazy loading images and asynchronous script loading are implemented. Cookie consent is managed with CookieYes, providing granular user control. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found, but use of Cloudflare bot management suggests a reliable CDN and security layer. The site is well-structured with comprehensive metadata and JSON-LD structured data for SEO and rich results. Overall, the technical implementation supports a fast, secure, and user-friendly experience with opportunities to improve security header implementation and explicit CMS identification.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agorapulse.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agorapulse.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.