Skip to main content

Security report for agilepartner.net

Agile Partner · Technology · Luxembourg

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agile Partner is a medium-sized technology company based in Luxembourg, specializing in custom software development and agile transformation services. With over 18 years of experience and a team of approximately 50 professionals, the company targets businesses seeking tailored digital solutions and agile coaching to support their digital transformation. The website is professionally designed, multilingual (French and English), and provides clear information about their services, certifications, and contact details. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and leverages modern JavaScript libraries and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and HubSpot, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, though the absence of security headers and explicit security policies suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS domain registration data is a notable concern, reducing trust in domain legitimacy despite the professional presentation. Overall, the website is functional, secure, and business-focused, but would benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agilepartner.net

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Agile Partner holds a solid position in the Luxembourg technology market, focusing on agile software development and organizational agility coaching. Their business model revolves around service delivery, including custom software projects and agile training. The company demonstrates strong branding consistency and trust signals such as industry awards and certifications. Their target customers are enterprises and organizations undergoing digital transformation. The website's content and structure support lead generation and client engagement. The partnership with Adoraweb for website crafting indicates a professional approach to digital presence. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company leverages multiple marketing and analytics platforms to optimize outreach and customer insights.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, uses reputable third-party analytics and marketing scripts, and does not expose sensitive information in the HTML source. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate moderate security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which is a critical trust factor. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a business website but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and improving transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies, including a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS domain registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agile Partner
Description
Depuis plus de 18 ans, Agile Partner développe des solutions digitales sur mesure et accompagne vos équipes dans l’adoption des méthodes agiles.
Key services
Custom software development, Agile transformation and coaching, Agile training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, FullPage.js, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot
Frameworks
FullPage.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts from reputable sources

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. Uses multiple reputable analytics and marketing tools.
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  7. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via dedicated contact page.
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Website is fully accessible with no WAF blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and FullPage.js for UI effects and navigation. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and HubSpot, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses lazy loading for images to improve performance. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of scripts and assets. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agilepartner.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agilepartner.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.